PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEA vs. SLYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEA vs. SLYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly lower than SLYV's 18.18% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: VEA at 10.53% and SLYV at 10.53%.


VEA

1D
3.63%
1M
1.92%
YTD
14.35%
6M
15.67%
1Y
30.39%
3Y*
19.28%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*
10.53%

SLYV

1D
1.81%
1M
5.47%
YTD
18.18%
6M
14.15%
1Y
36.99%
3Y*
14.26%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
10.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEA vs. SLYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.35%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
18.18%6.54%7.28%14.82%-11.08%30.57%2.68%24.26%-12.77%11.74%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and SLYV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007

0.72

The correlation between VEA and SLYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

VEA vs. SLYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEA
SLYV

Financial Services

23.3%
19.8%

Industrials

19.2%
11.6%

Technology

13.8%
11.3%

Healthcare

8.2%
7.5%

Basic Materials

7.5%
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
3.8%

Energy

5.4%
7.6%

Communication Services

3.4%
4.4%

Utilities

3.3%
2.2%

Real Estate

2.7%
8.7%

Financial Services

VEA
23.3%
SLYV
19.8%

Industrials

VEA
19.2%
SLYV
11.6%

Technology

VEA
13.8%
SLYV
11.3%

Healthcare

VEA
8.2%
SLYV
7.5%

Basic Materials

VEA
7.5%
SLYV
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VEA
7.5%
SLYV
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

VEA
5.6%
SLYV
3.8%

Energy

VEA
5.4%
SLYV
7.6%

Communication Services

VEA
3.4%
SLYV
4.4%

Utilities

VEA
3.3%
SLYV
2.2%

Real Estate

VEA
2.7%
SLYV
8.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEA vs. SLYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SLYV
SLYV Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SLYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEA vs. SLYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VEASLYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.35

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

3.97

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.08

13.17

-3.08

VEA vs. SLYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the SLYV Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and SLYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEA vs. SLYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, roughly equal to the maximum SLYV drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and SLYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEASLYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-61.15%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-9.36%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-28.68%

+15.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-28.68%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

-47.73%

+12.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

0.00%

-1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.28%

-8.94%

-4.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

2.82%

+0.20%

Volatility

VEA vs. SLYV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a higher volatility of 6.89% compared to SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) at 4.80%. This indicates that VEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEASLYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.89%

4.80%

+2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.42%

11.74%

+2.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.58%

18.30%

-1.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.72%

21.97%

-5.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.41%

23.96%

-6.55%

VEA vs. SLYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SLYV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEA vs. SLYV - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, more than SLYV's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
1.77%2.02%2.30%2.11%1.47%1.94%1.40%1.67%2.14%5.53%2.18%6.55%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.63%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEA and SLYV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (6.89%) compared to SLYV (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs SLYV's -61.15%.

On 10-year performance, SLYV leads with 10.53% vs 10.53% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLYV has performed better with a 10.53% return vs 10.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYV.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 1.77% for SLYV.

VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SLYV is Small Cap Value Equities. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.15% for SLYV.

SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEA and SLYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer