VEA vs. SLYG
VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) and SLYG (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while SLYG is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VEA returned 10.72%/yr vs 11.33%/yr for SLYG. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VEA charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SLYG.
Performance
VEA vs. SLYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 14.73% return, which is significantly lower than SLYG's 20.04% return. Over the past 10 years, VEA has underperformed SLYG with an annualized return of 10.72%, while SLYG has yielded a comparatively higher 11.33% annualized return.
VEA
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 14.73%
- 6M
- 16.65%
- 1Y
- 29.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.72%
SLYG
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 5.34%
- YTD
- 20.04%
- 6M
- 16.26%
- 1Y
- 29.84%
- 3Y*
- 14.84%
- 5Y*
- 6.11%
- 10Y*
- 11.33%
VEA vs. SLYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 14.73% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 20.04% | 5.20% | 9.38% | 17.27% | -21.26% | 22.42% | 19.48% | 20.97% | -4.20% | 14.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEA and SLYG is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007 | 0.73 |
The correlation between VEA and SLYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
VEA vs. SLYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VEA
SLYG
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
VEA
SLYG
Industrials
VEA
SLYG
Technology
VEA
SLYG
Healthcare
VEA
SLYG
Basic Materials
VEA
SLYG
Consumer Cyclical
VEA
SLYG
Consumer Defensive
VEA
SLYG
Energy
VEA
SLYG
Communication Services
VEA
SLYG
Utilities
VEA
SLYG
Real Estate
VEA
SLYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEA vs. SLYG — Risk / Return Rank
VEA
SLYG
VEA vs. SLYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VEA | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.29 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 3.29 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.92 | 11.60 | -1.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VEA vs. SLYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, roughly equal to the maximum SLYG drawdown of -62.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and SLYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEA | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.68% | -62.92% | +2.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -9.10% | -2.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.45% | -27.39% | +13.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -29.18% | -0.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.73% | -41.86% | +6.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | 0.00% | -1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.28% | -14.90% | +1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.59% | +0.43% |
Volatility
VEA vs. SLYG - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) at 5.57%. This indicates that VEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEA | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.84% | 5.57% | +1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.38% | 12.91% | +1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.58% | 17.93% | -1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 21.56% | -4.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 22.76% | -5.36% |
VEA vs. SLYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SLYG's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VEA vs. SLYG - Dividend Comparison
VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than SLYG's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 0.68% | 0.86% | 1.22% | 1.18% | 1.18% | 0.68% | 0.71% | 1.08% | 1.06% | 4.74% | 1.13% | 5.75% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.62% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VEA and SLYG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VEA has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to SLYG (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs SLYG's -62.92%.
On 10-year performance, SLYG leads with 11.33% vs 10.72% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SLYG has been the lower-risk option at 5.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLYG has performed better with a 11.33% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYG.
VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.68% for SLYG.
VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SLYG is Small Cap Growth Equities. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.15% for SLYG.
VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VEA and SLYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer