VEA vs. QDTE
VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) and QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while QDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. VEA is passively managed, while QDTE is actively managed. Over the past year, VEA returned 28.06% vs 34.41% for QDTE. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VEA charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for QDTE.
Performance
VEA vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VEA having a 12.02% return and QDTE slightly higher at 12.44%.
VEA
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 14.95%
- 1Y
- 28.06%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
QDTE
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 12.44%
- 6M
- 11.71%
- 1Y
- 34.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VEA vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 12.02% | 35.16% | -0.27% |
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 12.44% | 19.32% | 17.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEA and QDTE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024 | 0.63 |
The correlation between VEA and QDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
VEA vs. QDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VEA
QDTE
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
VEA
QDTE
Industrials
VEA
QDTE
-
Technology
VEA
QDTE
-
Healthcare
VEA
QDTE
-
Basic Materials
VEA
QDTE
-
Consumer Cyclical
VEA
QDTE
-
Consumer Defensive
VEA
QDTE
-
Energy
VEA
QDTE
-
Communication Services
VEA
QDTE
-
Utilities
VEA
QDTE
-
Real Estate
VEA
QDTE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEA vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank
VEA
QDTE
VEA vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VEA | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.39 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 3.39 | -0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.39 | 13.52 | -4.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VEA | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 2.20 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 1.17 | -0.93 |
Drawdowns
VEA vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, which is greater than QDTE's maximum drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and QDTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEA | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.68% | -22.86% | -37.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -10.20% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.40% | -3.70% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.29% | -3.14% | -10.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 2.55% | +0.45% |
Volatility
VEA vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) is 6.03%, while Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that VEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEA | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.03% | 6.57% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.91% | 12.26% | +1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.15% | 15.71% | +0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 18.72% | -2.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 18.72% | -1.32% |
VEA vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than QDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
VEA vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison
VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than QDTE's 44.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 44.14% | 49.49% | 32.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.69% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VEA and QDTE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QDTE has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to VEA (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs QDTE's -22.86%.
On 1-year performance, QDTE leads with 34.41% vs 28.06% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 6.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QDTE has performed better with a 34.41% return vs 28.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for QDTE.
QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 44.14%, compared with 2.69% for VEA.
VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while QDTE is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.97% for QDTE.
QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VEA and QDTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer