PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEA vs. QDTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEA vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VEA having a 12.02% return and QDTE slightly higher at 12.44%.


VEA

1D
1.00%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
12.02%
6M
14.95%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
10.14%

QDTE

1D
1.85%
1M
0.70%
YTD
12.44%
6M
11.71%
1Y
34.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEA vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
12.02%35.16%-0.27%
QDTE
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
12.44%19.32%17.13%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and QDTE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.63

The correlation between VEA and QDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

VEA vs. QDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEA
QDTE

Financial Services

23.3%
5.4%

Industrials

19.2%

-

Technology

13.8%

-

Healthcare

8.2%

-

Basic Materials

7.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.6%

-

Energy

5.4%

-

Communication Services

3.4%

-

Utilities

3.3%

-

Real Estate

2.7%

-

Financial Services

VEA
23.3%
QDTE
5.4%

Industrials

VEA
19.2%
QDTE

-

Technology

VEA
13.8%
QDTE

-

Healthcare

VEA
8.2%
QDTE

-

Basic Materials

VEA
7.5%
QDTE

-

Consumer Cyclical

VEA
7.5%
QDTE

-

Consumer Defensive

VEA
5.6%
QDTE

-

Energy

VEA
5.4%
QDTE

-

Communication Services

VEA
3.4%
QDTE

-

Utilities

VEA
3.3%
QDTE

-

Real Estate

VEA
2.7%
QDTE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEA vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

QDTE
QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEA vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEAQDTEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.39

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

3.39

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.39

13.52

-4.13

VEA vs. QDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the QDTE Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and QDTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEAQDTEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

2.20

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

1.17

-0.93

Drawdowns

VEA vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, which is greater than QDTE's maximum drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and QDTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEAQDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-22.86%

-37.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-10.20%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.40%

-3.70%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.29%

-3.14%

-10.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

2.55%

+0.45%

Volatility

VEA vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) is 6.03%, while Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that VEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEAQDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.03%

6.57%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

12.26%

+1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.15%

15.71%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

18.72%

-2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.40%

18.72%

-1.32%

VEA vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than QDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEA vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than QDTE's 44.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QDTE
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
44.14%49.49%32.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.69%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEA and QDTE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QDTE has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to VEA (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs QDTE's -22.86%.

On 1-year performance, QDTE leads with 34.41% vs 28.06% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 6.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QDTE has performed better with a 34.41% return vs 28.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for QDTE.

QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 44.14%, compared with 2.69% for VEA.

VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while QDTE is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.97% for QDTE.

QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEA and QDTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer