PortfoliosLab logo
QDTE vs. QQQI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QDTE and QQQI is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.9

Performance

QDTE vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.51%
7.95%
QDTE
QQQI

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QDTE:

0.36

QQQI:

0.60

Sortino Ratio

QDTE:

0.59

QQQI:

0.98

Omega Ratio

QDTE:

1.09

QQQI:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

QDTE:

0.34

QQQI:

0.64

Martin Ratio

QDTE:

1.26

QQQI:

2.50

Ulcer Index

QDTE:

6.18%

QQQI:

5.08%

Daily Std Dev

QDTE:

21.76%

QQQI:

21.32%

Max Drawdown

QDTE:

-22.86%

QQQI:

-20.00%

Current Drawdown

QDTE:

-17.49%

QQQI:

-10.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDTE achieves a -12.55% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's -6.16% return.


QDTE

YTD

-12.55%

1M

-11.79%

6M

-10.48%

1Y

5.91%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QQQI

YTD

-6.16%

1M

-4.75%

6M

-1.99%

1Y

10.62%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QDTE vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDTE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for QDTE: current value is 0.95%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
QDTE: 0.95%
Expense ratio chart for QQQI: current value is 0.68%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
QQQI: 0.68%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QDTE vs. QQQI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDTE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QDTE is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QDTE is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QDTE is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QDTE is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QDTE is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QDTE is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQI is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQI is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQI is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQI is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQI is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQI is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QDTE vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for QDTE, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
QDTE: 0.36
QQQI: 0.60
The chart of Sortino ratio for QDTE, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
QDTE: 0.59
QQQI: 0.98
The chart of Omega ratio for QDTE, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
QDTE: 1.09
QQQI: 1.15
The chart of Calmar ratio for QDTE, currently valued at 0.34, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
QDTE: 0.34
QQQI: 0.64
The chart of Martin ratio for QDTE, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
QDTE: 1.26
QQQI: 2.50

The current QDTE Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDTE and QQQI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.200.000.200.400.600.80Mar 16Mar 23Mar 30Apr 06Apr 13Apr 20
0.36
0.60
QDTE
QQQI

Dividends

QDTE vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.26%, more than QQQI's 15.57% yield.


Drawdowns

QDTE vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDTE drawdown since its inception was -22.86%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTE and QQQI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-17.49%
-10.71%
QDTE
QQQI

Volatility

QDTE vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) is 13.09%, while NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a volatility of 15.24%. This indicates that QDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
13.09%
15.24%
QDTE
QQQI