PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
QDTE vs. QQQI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QDTE vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.51%
10.79%
QDTE
QQQI

Returns By Period


QDTE

YTD

N/A

1M

1.70%

6M

14.51%

1Y

N/A

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

QQQI

YTD

N/A

1M

1.98%

6M

10.79%

1Y

N/A

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

Key characteristics


QDTEQQQI
Daily Std Dev17.08%14.48%
Max Drawdown-10.74%-10.67%
Current Drawdown-2.18%-0.73%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QDTE vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDTE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.


QDTE
Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
Expense ratio chart for QDTE: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%
Expense ratio chart for QQQI: current value at 0.68% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.68%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.01.0

The correlation between QDTE and QQQI is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QDTE vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
No data
QDTE
QQQI

Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

QDTE vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.24%, more than QQQI's 11.75% yield.


TTM
QDTE
Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
24.24%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF
11.75%

Drawdowns

QDTE vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDTE drawdown since its inception was -10.74%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQI drawdown of -10.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTE and QQQI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.18%
-0.73%
QDTE
QQQI

Volatility

QDTE vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 3.67%. This indicates that QDTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.03%
3.67%
QDTE
QQQI