QDTE vs. YMAX
QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and YMAX (YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QDTE returned 39.17% vs 9.04% for YMAX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QDTE charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for YMAX.
Performance
QDTE vs. YMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDTE achieves a 16.06% return, which is significantly higher than YMAX's 6.30% return.
QDTE
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 7.12%
- YTD
- 16.06%
- 6M
- 15.73%
- 1Y
- 39.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YMAX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 6.50%
- YTD
- 6.30%
- 6M
- 3.22%
- 1Y
- 9.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDTE vs. YMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 16.06% | 19.32% | 16.07% |
YMAX YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs | 6.30% | 6.04% | 13.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDTE and YMAX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024 | 0.81 |
The correlation between QDTE and YMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
QDTE vs. YMAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDTE
YMAX
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
QDTE
YMAX
Basic Materials
QDTE
-
YMAX
Communication Services
QDTE
-
YMAX
Consumer Cyclical
QDTE
-
YMAX
Consumer Defensive
QDTE
-
YMAX
Energy
QDTE
-
YMAX
Healthcare
QDTE
-
YMAX
Industrials
QDTE
-
YMAX
Real Estate
QDTE
-
YMAX
Technology
QDTE
-
YMAX
Utilities
QDTE
-
YMAX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDTE vs. YMAX — Risk / Return Rank
QDTE
YMAX
QDTE vs. YMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDTE | YMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.09 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.86 | 0.35 | +3.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.60 | 0.82 | +14.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDTE | YMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | 0.42 | +2.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.29 | 0.70 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
QDTE vs. YMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDTE drawdown since its inception was -22.86%, smaller than the maximum YMAX drawdown of -26.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTE and YMAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDTE | YMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.86% | -26.13% | +3.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.20% | -26.13% | +15.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -5.75% | +5.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.14% | -6.33% | +3.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 11.00% | -8.48% |
Volatility
QDTE vs. YMAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) is 3.72%, while YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) has a volatility of 6.22%. This indicates that QDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDTE | YMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 6.22% | -2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.01% | 17.09% | -6.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.81% | 21.60% | -6.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 22.95% | -4.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 22.95% | -4.53% |
QDTE vs. YMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDTE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than YMAX's 1.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDTE vs. YMAX - Dividend Comparison
QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.41%, less than YMAX's 72.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 43.41% | 49.49% | 32.09% |
YMAX YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs | 72.77% | 78.70% | 44.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDTE and YMAX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YMAX has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to QDTE (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDTE dropped -22.86% vs YMAX's -26.13%.
On 1-year performance, QDTE leads with 39.17% vs 9.04% for YMAX. On fees, QDTE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, QDTE has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QDTE has performed better with a 39.17% return vs 9.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QDTE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAX.
YMAX has the higher dividend yield at 72.77%, compared with 43.41% for QDTE.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for QDTE and 1.28% for YMAX.
QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDTE and YMAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer