QDTE vs. QQQ
QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. QDTE is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. Over the past year, QDTE returned 39.17% vs 40.74% for QQQ. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QDTE charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
QDTE vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDTE achieves a 16.06% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.71% return.
QDTE
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 7.12%
- YTD
- 16.06%
- 6M
- 15.73%
- 1Y
- 39.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 8.66%
- YTD
- 20.71%
- 6M
- 19.19%
- 1Y
- 40.74%
- 3Y*
- 28.54%
- 5Y*
- 17.86%
- 10Y*
- 21.84%
QDTE vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 16.06% | 19.32% | 16.07% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 20.71% | 20.77% | 15.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDTE and QQQ is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024 | 0.97 |
The correlation between QDTE and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
QDTE vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDTE
QQQ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
QDTE
QQQ
Basic Materials
QDTE
-
QQQ
Communication Services
QDTE
-
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
QDTE
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
QDTE
-
QQQ
Energy
QDTE
-
QQQ
Healthcare
QDTE
-
QQQ
Industrials
QDTE
-
QQQ
Real Estate
QDTE
-
QQQ
Technology
QDTE
-
QQQ
Utilities
QDTE
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDTE vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
QDTE
QQQ
QDTE vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDTE | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.44 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.86 | 3.42 | +0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.60 | 13.14 | +2.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDTE | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | 2.57 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.29 | 0.41 | +0.88 |
Drawdowns
QDTE vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDTE drawdown since its inception was -22.86%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTE and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDTE | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.86% | -82.97% | +60.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.20% | -11.96% | +1.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -0.74% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.14% | -32.78% | +29.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 3.11% | -0.59% |
Volatility
QDTE vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) is 3.72%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that QDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDTE | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 4.51% | -0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.01% | 12.10% | -1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.81% | 15.94% | -1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 22.37% | -3.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 22.29% | -3.87% |
QDTE vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDTE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDTE vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.41%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 43.41% | 49.49% | 32.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, QDTE and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QQQ has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to QDTE (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDTE dropped -22.86% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 1-year performance, QQQ leads with 40.74% vs 39.17% for QDTE. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QDTE has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 40.74% return vs 39.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for QDTE.
QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 43.41%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
QDTE is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for QDTE and 0.18% for QQQ.
QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDTE and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer