PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEA vs. MS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEA vs. MS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Morgan Stanley (MS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 12.02% return, which is significantly lower than MS's 20.86% return. Over the past 10 years, VEA has underperformed MS with an annualized return of 10.14%, while MS has yielded a comparatively higher 27.13% annualized return.


VEA

1D
1.00%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
12.02%
6M
14.95%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
10.14%

MS

1D
0.15%
1M
9.92%
YTD
20.86%
6M
21.34%
1Y
64.89%
3Y*
39.40%
5Y*
21.89%
10Y*
27.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEA vs. MS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
12.02%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%
MS
Morgan Stanley
20.86%45.16%39.73%13.93%-10.34%46.65%38.09%32.67%-22.76%26.61%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and MS is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007

0.61

The correlation between VEA and MS shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (3 years) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEA vs. MS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

MS
MS Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
MS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
MS Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEA vs. MS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Morgan Stanley (MS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEAMSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.43

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

3.46

-1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.39

11.46

-2.07

VEA vs. MS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the MS Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and MS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEAMSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

2.55

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.77

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.86

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.29

-0.05

Drawdowns

VEA vs. MS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, smaller than the maximum MS drawdown of -88.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and MS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEAMSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-88.12%

+27.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-18.83%

+7.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-29.24%

+15.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-32.38%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

-51.33%

+15.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.40%

-2.76%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.29%

-33.70%

+20.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

5.68%

-2.68%

Volatility

VEA vs. MS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) is 6.03%, while Morgan Stanley (MS) has a volatility of 8.06%. This indicates that VEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEAMSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.03%

8.06%

-2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

21.21%

-7.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.15%

25.62%

-9.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

28.72%

-12.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.40%

31.51%

-14.11%

Dividends

VEA vs. MS - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than MS's 1.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MS
Morgan Stanley
1.88%2.17%2.82%3.49%3.47%2.14%2.04%2.54%2.77%1.72%1.66%1.73%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.69%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEA and MS have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MS has higher volatility (8.06%) compared to VEA (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs MS's -88.12%.

MS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEA and MS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer