PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEA vs. IPOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEA vs. IPOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 16.41% return, which is significantly lower than IPOS's 38.69% return. Over the past 10 years, VEA has outperformed IPOS with an annualized return of 10.24%, while IPOS has yielded a comparatively lower 2.80% annualized return.


VEA

1D
1.66%
1M
1.99%
6M
9.00%
YTD
16.41%
1Y
30.82%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*
10.24%
ALL TIME*
5.25%

IPOS

1D
3.52%
1M
-4.80%
6M
25.09%
YTD
38.69%
1Y
53.57%
3Y*
14.51%
5Y*
-6.31%
10Y*
2.80%
ALL TIME*
2.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$101.01K$73.10K$105.19K
$653.63M$753.15M$792.32M

VEA vs. IPOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
16.41%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%
IPOS
Renaissance International IPO ETF
38.69%39.93%-12.34%-16.49%-33.46%-30.62%50.71%30.93%-22.33%36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and IPOS is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2014

0.55

The correlation between VEA and IPOS shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VEA vs. IPOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEA
IPOS

Financial Services

23.1%
7.5%

Technology

18.4%
46.6%

Industrials

17.9%
14.5%

Healthcare

7.9%
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
3.4%

Basic Materials

6.9%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
6.1%

Energy

4.5%
4.9%

Communication Services

3.2%
0.3%

Utilities

3.1%
3.1%

Real Estate

2.5%

-

Financial Services

VEA
23.1%
IPOS
7.5%

Technology

VEA
18.4%
IPOS
46.6%

Industrials

VEA
17.9%
IPOS
14.5%

Healthcare

VEA
7.9%
IPOS
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VEA
7.3%
IPOS
3.4%

Basic Materials

VEA
6.9%
IPOS
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

VEA
5.3%
IPOS
6.1%

Energy

VEA
4.5%
IPOS
4.9%

Communication Services

VEA
3.2%
IPOS
0.3%

Utilities

VEA
3.1%
IPOS
3.1%

Real Estate

VEA
2.5%
IPOS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEA vs. IPOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

IPOS
IPOS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IPOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPOS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IPOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPOS Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VEA vs. IPOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VEAIPOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.28

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

2.95

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.95

8.00

+1.95

VEA vs. IPOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the IPOS Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and IPOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEA vs. IPOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, smaller than the maximum IPOS drawdown of -73.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and IPOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEAIPOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-73.09%

+12.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-18.27%

+6.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-31.44%

+17.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-67.38%

+37.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

-73.09%

+37.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-41.06%

+40.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.19%

-32.10%

+18.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

6.72%

-3.61%

Volatility

VEA vs. IPOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) is 5.44%, while Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a volatility of 10.84%. This indicates that VEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEAIPOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.44%

10.84%

-5.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.43%

31.50%

-16.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.29%

34.33%

-17.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.86%

28.21%

-11.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.22%

24.63%

-7.41%

VEA vs. IPOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IPOS's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEA vs. IPOS - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, more than IPOS's 0.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPOS
Renaissance International IPO ETF
0.34%1.04%0.93%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.25%0.89%1.12%0.87%1.73%1.08%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.51%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEA and IPOS have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IPOS has higher volatility (10.84%) compared to VEA (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs IPOS's -73.09%.

On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.24% vs 2.80% for IPOS. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 5.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.24% return vs 2.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 0.34% for IPOS.

VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Renaissance Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.80% for IPOS.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEA and IPOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer