VEA vs. DBAW
VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) and DBAW (Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - VEA tracks the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index while DBAW tracks the MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VEA returned 11.09%/yr vs 12.19%/yr for DBAW. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VEA charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DBAW.
Performance
VEA vs. DBAW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 14.71% return, which is significantly lower than DBAW's 17.04% return. Over the past 10 years, VEA has underperformed DBAW with an annualized return of 11.09%, while DBAW has yielded a comparatively higher 12.19% annualized return.
VEA
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- 14.71%
- 6M
- 14.32%
- 1Y
- 31.05%
- 3Y*
- 19.91%
- 5Y*
- 9.74%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
DBAW
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 17.04%
- 6M
- 17.08%
- 1Y
- 35.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.70%
- 5Y*
- 11.32%
- 10Y*
- 12.19%
VEA vs. DBAW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 14.71% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF | 17.04% | 26.47% | 14.35% | 16.26% | -13.35% | 13.08% | 7.44% | 22.96% | -10.38% | 18.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEA and DBAW is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2014 | 0.86 |
The correlation between VEA and DBAW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
VEA vs. DBAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VEA
DBAW
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
VEA
DBAW
Industrials
VEA
DBAW
Technology
VEA
DBAW
Healthcare
VEA
DBAW
Basic Materials
VEA
DBAW
Consumer Cyclical
VEA
DBAW
Consumer Defensive
VEA
DBAW
Energy
VEA
DBAW
Communication Services
VEA
DBAW
Utilities
VEA
DBAW
Real Estate
VEA
DBAW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEA vs. DBAW — Risk / Return Rank
VEA
DBAW
VEA vs. DBAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VEA | DBAW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.50 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 3.99 | -1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.30 | 16.12 | -5.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VEA vs. DBAW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, which is greater than DBAW's maximum drawdown of -31.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and DBAW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEA | DBAW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.68% | -31.44% | -29.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -9.00% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.45% | -14.11% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -17.87% | -11.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.73% | -31.44% | -4.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.70% | -1.95% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.25% | -4.98% | -8.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.22% | +0.80% |
Volatility
VEA vs. DBAW - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a higher volatility of 6.94% compared to Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) at 6.13%. This indicates that VEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEA | DBAW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.94% | 6.13% | +0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.77% | 12.33% | +2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.78% | 13.99% | +2.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.77% | 13.97% | +2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 15.21% | +1.99% |
VEA vs. DBAW - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than DBAW's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
VEA vs. DBAW - Dividend Comparison
VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than DBAW's 1.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF | 1.68% | 3.83% | 1.70% | 3.45% | 8.81% | 2.05% | 2.08% | 2.91% | 2.93% | 2.41% | 1.99% | 5.74% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.55% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, VEA and DBAW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VEA has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to DBAW (6.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs DBAW's -31.44%.
On 10-year performance, DBAW leads with 12.19% vs 11.09% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DBAW has been the lower-risk option at 6.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBAW has performed better with a 12.19% return vs 11.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DBAW.
VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 1.68% for DBAW.
VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while DBAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.41% for DBAW.
DBAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VEA and DBAW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer