PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCIT vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCIT vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCIT achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 12.47% return. Over the past 10 years, VCIT has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 2.93%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.90% annualized return.


VCIT

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.18%
6M
0.07%
1Y
6.13%
3Y*
6.00%
5Y*
1.22%
10Y*
2.93%

VYM

1D
-0.43%
1M
3.38%
YTD
12.47%
6M
12.01%
1Y
26.16%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCIT vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.18%9.34%3.20%8.98%-13.98%-1.77%9.46%14.10%-1.74%5.31%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
12.47%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VCIT and VYM is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2009

0.01

Over the past year, VCIT and VYM have become more correlated (0.39) than their long-term average of 0.01, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCIT vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCIT
VCIT Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
VCIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCIT Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
VCIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCIT vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCITVYMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.50

2.56

-1.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.22

3.65

-1.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.46

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

3.93

-1.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.95

14.76

-7.81

VCIT vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCIT Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCIT and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCITVYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

2.56

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.83

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.73

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.51

+0.24

Drawdowns

VCIT vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCIT drawdown since its inception was -20.56%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCIT and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCITVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.56%

-56.98%

+36.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.96%

-6.69%

+3.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

-14.46%

+8.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.56%

-15.84%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.56%

-35.21%

+14.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-0.43%

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.16%

-7.19%

+4.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

1.78%

-0.90%

Volatility

VCIT vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) is 1.38%, while Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that VCIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCITVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

2.77%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.06%

7.67%

-4.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.10%

10.28%

-6.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.61%

13.96%

-7.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.28%

16.34%

-10.06%

VCIT vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VCIT and VYM have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VCIT vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

VCIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, more than VYM's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.80%4.62%4.43%3.72%3.03%2.87%2.78%3.37%3.61%3.21%3.29%3.34%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.19%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCIT and VYM have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VYM has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to VCIT (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCIT dropped -20.56% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.90% vs 2.93% for VCIT. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, VCIT has been the lower-risk option at 1.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.90% return vs 2.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCIT and VYM have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.

VCIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 2.19% for VYM.

VCIT is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VYM is Dividend. VCIT tracks Barclays U.S. 5-10 Year Corp Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCIT and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer