PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBK vs. BKLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBK vs. BKLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBK achieves a 14.03% return, which is significantly higher than BKLC's 8.75% return.


VBK

1D
0.58%
1M
0.15%
YTD
14.03%
6M
12.70%
1Y
27.37%
3Y*
16.31%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
11.47%

BKLC

1D
0.37%
1M
0.47%
YTD
8.75%
6M
8.75%
1Y
24.83%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBK vs. BKLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
14.03%8.50%16.50%21.45%-28.44%5.66%65.73%
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
8.75%18.06%25.56%30.88%-20.52%27.41%37.38%

Correlation

The correlation between VBK and BKLC is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2020

0.83

The correlation between VBK and BKLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

VBK vs. BKLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VBK
BKLC

Technology

25.9%
38.2%

Industrials

24.7%
7.8%

Healthcare

15.3%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
10.0%

Financial Services

5.6%
10.7%

Energy

4.8%
3.2%

Real Estate

3.9%
1.6%

Communication Services

3.5%
10.8%

Basic Materials

3.2%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
4.4%

Utilities

1.2%
2.5%

Technology

VBK
25.9%
BKLC
38.2%

Industrials

VBK
24.7%
BKLC
7.8%

Healthcare

VBK
15.3%
BKLC
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VBK
9.6%
BKLC
10.0%

Financial Services

VBK
5.6%
BKLC
10.7%

Energy

VBK
4.8%
BKLC
3.2%

Real Estate

VBK
3.9%
BKLC
1.6%

Communication Services

VBK
3.5%
BKLC
10.8%

Basic Materials

VBK
3.2%
BKLC
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

VBK
2.4%
BKLC
4.4%

Utilities

VBK
1.2%
BKLC
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBK vs. BKLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBK
VBK Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
VBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBK Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
VBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBK Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

BKLC
BKLC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
BKLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLC Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBK vs. BKLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBKBKLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.37

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.74

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.10

12.42

-3.32

VBK vs. BKLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBK Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the BKLC Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBK and BKLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBKBKLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

2.01

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.81

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

1.10

-0.67

Drawdowns

VBK vs. BKLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBK drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, which is greater than BKLC's maximum drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBK and BKLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBKBKLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.68%

-26.14%

-32.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.44%

-9.10%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.54%

-19.05%

-8.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.39%

-26.14%

-12.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.91%

-2.69%

-1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.15%

-5.26%

-4.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

2.00%

+1.02%

Volatility

VBK vs. BKLC - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) at 3.98%. This indicates that VBK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBKBKLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

3.98%

+2.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.18%

9.58%

+5.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.65%

12.42%

+7.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.54%

17.21%

+6.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.90%

17.47%

+5.43%

VBK vs. BKLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BKLC's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBK vs. BKLC - Dividend Comparison

VBK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than BKLC's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
1.03%1.05%1.22%1.35%1.64%1.10%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.46%0.54%0.54%0.68%0.55%0.36%0.44%0.57%0.79%0.82%1.08%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBK and BKLC have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBK has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to BKLC (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBK dropped -58.68% vs BKLC's -26.14%.

On 5-year performance, BKLC leads with 13.91% vs 4.73% for VBK. On fees, BKLC is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, BKLC has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BKLC has performed better with a 13.91% return vs 4.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKLC is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VBK.

BKLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.46% for VBK.

VBK is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while BKLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. VBK tracks CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index, while BKLC tracks Morningstar US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBK and 0.00% for BKLC.

BKLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBK and BKLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer