VBK vs. VB
VBK (Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VBK is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index, while VB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VBK returned 12.20%/yr vs 11.79%/yr for VB. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.05% expense ratio.
Performance
VBK vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VBK achieves a 18.61% return, which is significantly higher than VB's 15.68% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VBK having a 12.20% annualized return and VB not far behind at 11.79%.
VBK
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 18.61%
- 6M
- 15.14%
- 1Y
- 33.39%
- 3Y*
- 18.20%
- 5Y*
- 5.09%
- 10Y*
- 12.20%
VB
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 15.68%
- 6M
- 13.00%
- 1Y
- 30.17%
- 3Y*
- 17.54%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.79%
VBK vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBK Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF | 18.61% | 8.50% | 16.50% | 21.45% | -28.44% | 5.66% | 35.44% | 32.75% | -5.70% | 21.87% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 15.68% | 8.87% | 14.17% | 18.22% | -17.51% | 17.57% | 19.19% | 27.34% | -9.34% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBK and VB is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.96 |
The correlation between VBK and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
VBK vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VBK
VB
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Energy
Real Estate
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
VBK
VB
Industrials
VBK
VB
Healthcare
VBK
VB
Consumer Cyclical
VBK
VB
Financial Services
VBK
VB
Energy
VBK
VB
Real Estate
VBK
VB
Communication Services
VBK
VB
Consumer Defensive
VBK
VB
Basic Materials
VBK
VB
Utilities
VBK
VB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBK vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank
VBK
VB
VBK vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VBK | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.31 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 3.38 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.98 | 12.38 | -1.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VBK vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBK drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, roughly equal to the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBK and VB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBK | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.68% | -59.56% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.44% | -8.98% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.54% | -25.36% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.39% | -28.15% | -10.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.70% | -42.05% | +3.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.39% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.14% | -8.42% | -1.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 2.44% | +0.61% |
Volatility
VBK vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) has a higher volatility of 6.94% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 4.92%. This indicates that VBK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBK | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.94% | 4.92% | +2.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.58% | 12.21% | +3.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.07% | 16.66% | +3.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.62% | 20.78% | +2.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.94% | 21.45% | +1.49% |
VBK vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VBK and VB have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBK vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
VBK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than VB's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.18% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
VBK Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.44% | 0.54% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.55% | 0.36% | 0.44% | 0.57% | 0.79% | 0.82% | 1.08% | 0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, VBK and VB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VBK has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to VB (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBK dropped -58.68% vs VB's -59.56%.
On 10-year performance, VBK leads with 12.20% vs 11.79% for VB. Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. On volatility, VB has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VBK has performed better with a 12.20% return vs 11.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VBK and VB have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.
VB has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.44% for VBK.
VBK is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VB is Small Cap Blend Equities. VBK tracks CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index, while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index.
VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VBK and VB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer