VBK vs. VB

In the year-to-date period, VBK achieves a -18.76% return, which is significantly lower than VB's -16.09% return. Over the past 10 years, VBK has underperformed VB with an annualized return of 6.21%, while VB has yielded a comparatively higher 6.70% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VBK has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current VBK Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is comparable to the VB Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBK and VB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

VBK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than VB's 1.68% yield.

The maximum VBK drawdown since its inception was -58.69%, roughly equal to the maximum VB drawdown of -59.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBK and VB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) has a higher volatility of 11.22% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 10.31%. This indicates that VBK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.