PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBK vs. VB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBK vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBK achieves a 12.94% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 15.19% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VBK having a 10.90% annualized return and VB not far ahead at 11.08%.


VBK

1D
-0.27%
1M
-4.86%
6M
9.06%
YTD
12.94%
1Y
23.19%
3Y*
13.33%
5Y*
4.14%
10Y*
10.90%
ALL TIME*
9.75%

VB

1D
-0.22%
1M
-1.73%
6M
10.09%
YTD
15.19%
1Y
25.91%
3Y*
14.02%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
11.08%
ALL TIME*
9.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$121.48M$119.40M$165.11M
$67.40M$71.27M$83.02M

VBK vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
12.94%8.50%16.50%21.45%-28.44%5.66%35.44%32.75%-5.70%21.87%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
15.19%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%19.19%27.34%-9.34%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between VBK and VB is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.96

The correlation between VBK and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

VBK vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VBK
VB

Technology

27.1%
17.9%

Industrials

23.4%
19.9%

Healthcare

17.9%
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
11.6%

Financial Services

5.7%
12.4%

Real Estate

3.7%
7.9%

Communication Services

3.6%
2.9%

Energy

3.4%
3.9%

Basic Materials

3.1%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
3.3%

Utilities

1.1%
3.3%

Technology

VBK
27.1%
VB
17.9%

Industrials

VBK
23.4%
VB
19.9%

Healthcare

VBK
17.9%
VB
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VBK
8.9%
VB
11.6%

Financial Services

VBK
5.7%
VB
12.4%

Real Estate

VBK
3.7%
VB
7.9%

Communication Services

VBK
3.6%
VB
2.9%

Energy

VBK
3.4%
VB
3.9%

Basic Materials

VBK
3.1%
VB
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

VBK
2.0%
VB
3.3%

Utilities

VBK
1.1%
VB
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBK vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VBK
VBK Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBK Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
VBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBK Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VBK vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBKVBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.26

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

2.67

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.29

9.73

-3.44

VBK vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBK Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the VB Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBK and VB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VBK vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBK drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, roughly equal to the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBK and VB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBKVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.68%

-59.56%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.44%

-8.98%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.54%

-25.36%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.39%

-28.15%

-10.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.70%

-42.05%

+3.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.90%

-2.63%

-4.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.10%

-8.39%

-1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

2.46%

+0.91%

Volatility

VBK vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 3.36%. This indicates that VBK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBKVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.16%

3.36%

+1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.93%

12.01%

+3.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.39%

16.47%

+3.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.65%

20.69%

+2.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.91%

21.37%

+1.54%

VBK vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBK vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

VBK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than VB's 1.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.22%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.45%0.54%0.54%0.68%0.55%0.36%0.44%0.57%0.79%0.82%1.08%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, VBK and VB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VBK has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to VB (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBK dropped -58.68% vs VB's -59.56%.

On 10-year performance, VB leads with 11.08% vs 10.90% for VBK. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VB has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VB has performed better with a 11.08% return vs 10.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VBK.

VB has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.45% for VBK.

VBK is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VB is Small Cap Blend Equities. VBK tracks CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index, while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBK and 0.03% for VB.

VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBK and VB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer