VBCF vs. VIG
VBCF (Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF) and VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VBCF is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2032 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VBCF charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VIG.
Performance
VBCF vs. VIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VBCF
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VIG
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 7.13%
- YTD
- 9.56%
- 1Y
- 17.87%
- 3Y*
- 15.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.71%
- 10Y*
- 13.00%
VBCF vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VBCF Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.27% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 11.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBCF and VIG is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBCF vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank
VBCF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VIG
VBCF vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCF) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VBCF | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.17 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.80 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VBCF vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBCF drawdown since its inception was -1.86%, smaller than the maximum VIG drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCF and VIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBCF | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.86% | -46.81% | +44.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -0.08% | -0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.60% | -5.49% | +4.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.95% | — |
Volatility
VBCF vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBCF | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.26% | 10.02% | -5.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.26% | 14.20% | -9.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.26% | 16.01% | -11.75% |
VBCF vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBCF has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBCF vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison
VBCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than VIG's 1.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBCF Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.50% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBCF and VIG have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VBCF.
VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.89% for VBCF.
VBCF is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VIG is Dividend. VBCF tracks ICE 2032 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCF and 0.04% for VIG.
Find the right allocation for VBCF and VIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer