PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VB vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VB vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VB achieves a 14.91% return, which is significantly higher than VYM's 12.96% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VB having a 11.38% annualized return and VYM not far ahead at 11.94%.


VB

1D
0.75%
1M
3.68%
YTD
14.91%
6M
16.03%
1Y
31.39%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
11.38%

VYM

1D
1.24%
1M
2.98%
YTD
12.96%
6M
13.69%
1Y
27.70%
3Y*
19.05%
5Y*
11.67%
10Y*
11.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VB vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
14.91%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%19.19%27.34%-9.34%16.26%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
12.96%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VB and VYM is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2006

0.85

The correlation between VB and VYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

VB vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VB
VYM

Industrials

20.8%
12.1%

Technology

17.2%
17.7%

Financial Services

12.6%
20.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
6.7%

Healthcare

11.1%
12.2%

Real Estate

7.6%
0.0%

Basic Materials

4.8%
3.5%

Energy

4.7%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
8.1%

Utilities

3.3%
5.7%

Communication Services

3.1%
3.5%

Industrials

VB
20.8%
VYM
12.1%

Technology

VB
17.2%
VYM
17.7%

Financial Services

VB
12.6%
VYM
20.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VB
11.3%
VYM
6.7%

Healthcare

VB
11.1%
VYM
12.2%

Real Estate

VB
7.6%
VYM
0.0%

Basic Materials

VB
4.8%
VYM
3.5%

Energy

VB
4.7%
VYM
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

VB
3.4%
VYM
8.1%

Utilities

VB
3.3%
VYM
5.7%

Communication Services

VB
3.1%
VYM
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VB vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VB vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBVYMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.94

2.71

-0.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.75

3.84

-1.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.49

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

4.20

-0.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.82

15.80

-2.98

VB vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VB Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VB and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBVYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

2.71

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.84

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.73

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.51

-0.07

Drawdowns

VB vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VB drawdown since its inception was -59.56%, roughly equal to the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VB and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.56%

-56.98%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-6.69%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.36%

-14.46%

-10.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.15%

-15.84%

-12.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.05%

-35.21%

-6.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.44%

-7.20%

-1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

1.78%

+0.65%

Volatility

VB vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.88%. This indicates that VB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

2.88%

+1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

7.73%

+4.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.27%

10.27%

+6.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.75%

13.96%

+6.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.43%

16.34%

+5.09%

VB vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VB has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VB vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than VYM's 2.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.19%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.18%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VB and VYM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VB has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to VYM (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VB dropped -59.56% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.94% vs 11.38% for VB. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.94% return vs 11.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VB.

VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 1.19% for VB.

VB is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VYM is Dividend. VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VB and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VB and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer