PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VB vs. VBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VB vs. VBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VB achieves a 15.19% return, which is significantly lower than VBR's 16.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VB having a 11.08% annualized return and VBR not far behind at 10.75%.


VB

1D
-0.22%
1M
-2.11%
6M
10.09%
YTD
15.19%
1Y
23.84%
3Y*
14.02%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
11.08%
ALL TIME*
9.88%

VBR

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.78%
6M
10.78%
YTD
16.70%
1Y
25.82%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
10.75%
ALL TIME*
9.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$121.48M$119.40M$165.11M
$56.96M$55.85M$67.93M

VB vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
15.19%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%19.19%27.34%-9.34%16.26%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
16.70%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between VB and VBR is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.97

The correlation between VB and VBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

VB vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VB
VBR

Industrials

19.9%
17.3%

Technology

17.9%
10.9%

Healthcare

12.5%
8.4%

Financial Services

12.4%
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
13.6%

Real Estate

7.9%
11.1%

Basic Materials

4.4%
5.3%

Energy

3.9%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
4.2%

Utilities

3.3%
4.9%

Communication Services

2.9%
2.4%

Industrials

VB
19.9%
VBR
17.3%

Technology

VB
17.9%
VBR
10.9%

Healthcare

VB
12.5%
VBR
8.4%

Financial Services

VB
12.4%
VBR
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VB
11.6%
VBR
13.6%

Real Estate

VB
7.9%
VBR
11.1%

Basic Materials

VB
4.4%
VBR
5.3%

Energy

VB
3.9%
VBR
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

VB
3.3%
VBR
4.2%

Utilities

VB
3.3%
VBR
4.9%

Communication Services

VB
2.9%
VBR
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VB vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VB vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBVBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

2.93

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.73

10.70

-0.97

VB vs. VBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VB Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the VBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VB and VBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VB vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VB drawdown since its inception was -59.56%, roughly equal to the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VB and VBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBVBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.56%

-61.98%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-8.85%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.36%

-24.19%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.15%

-24.19%

-3.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.05%

-45.28%

+3.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.63%

-1.40%

-1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.39%

-8.21%

-0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

2.42%

+0.04%

Volatility

VB vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) have volatilities of 3.36% and 3.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBVBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

3.36%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.01%

10.22%

+1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.47%

14.90%

+1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.69%

19.56%

+1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.37%

21.66%

-0.29%

VB vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VB vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison

VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than VBR's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.22%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.77%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, VB and VBR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VBR has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to VB (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VB dropped -59.56% vs VBR's -61.98%.

On 10-year performance, VB leads with 11.08% vs 10.75% for VBR. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VB has performed better with a 11.08% return vs 10.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VBR.

VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.22% for VB.

VB is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VBR is Small Cap Value Equities. VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index, while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VB and 0.05% for VBR.

VBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VB and VBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer