VB vs. SCHA
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA).
VB and SCHA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VB is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Small Cap. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. SCHA is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009. Both VB and SCHA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VB or SCHA.
Key characteristics
| VB | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 13.13% | 10.95% |
| 1Y Return | 37.41% | 37.18% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.98% | 1.48% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.51% | 9.84% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 9.26% | 9.04% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.21 | 1.96 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.05 | 2.74 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.38 | 1.33 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.61 | 1.38 |
| Martin Ratio | 12.44 | 11.35 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.09% | 3.36% |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.42% | 19.52% |
| Max Drawdown | -59.58% | -42.41% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.42% | -1.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between VB and SCHA is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VB vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, VB achieves a 13.13% return, which is significantly higher than SCHA's 10.95% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VB having a 9.26% annualized return and SCHA not far behind at 9.04%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VB vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
VB has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VB vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VB vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than SCHA's 2.09% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.38% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% | 1.43% | 1.31% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 2.09% | 2.56% | 2.57% | 1.48% | 1.39% | 2.28% | 2.84% | 1.70% | 2.41% | 2.61% | 1.78% | 2.05% |
Drawdowns
VB vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VB drawdown since its inception was -59.58%, which is greater than SCHA's maximum drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VB and SCHA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VB vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) is 3.50%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that VB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.