VB vs. FNDF

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) and FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Index, while FNDF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VB returned 11.18%/yr vs 11.78%/yr for FNDF. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VB charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDF.

Performance

VB vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VB achieves a 12.60% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 17.34% return. Over the past 10 years, VB has underperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 11.18%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.78% annualized return.

VB

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 12.60%
• 6M: 12.39%
• 1Y: 25.97%
• 3Y*: 15.91%
• 5Y*: 6.58%
• 10Y*: 11.18%

FNDF

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: -0.45%
• YTD: 17.34%
• 6M: 20.48%
• 1Y: 39.17%
• 3Y*: 22.42%
• 5Y*: 12.75%
• 10Y*: 11.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VB vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	12.60%	8.87%	14.17%	18.22%	-17.51%	17.57%	19.19%	27.34%	-9.34%	16.26%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	17.34%	40.99%	2.29%	20.22%	-7.78%	14.97%	3.61%	18.46%	-14.21%	23.98%

Correlation

The correlation between VB and FNDF is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013	0.74

The correlation between VB and FNDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

VB vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VB	FNDF
Industrials	20.8%	15.9%
Technology	17.2%	11.1%
Financial Services	12.6%	16.7%
Consumer Cyclical	11.3%	10.7%
Healthcare	11.1%	5.5%
Real Estate	7.6%	0.9%
Basic Materials	4.8%	11.3%
Energy	4.7%	12.3%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	6.9%
Utilities	3.3%	3.8%
Communication Services	3.1%	4.9%

Return for Risk

VB vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VB

VB Risk / Return Rank: 56
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 49
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 64

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 82
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VB vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VB	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	2.53	-0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	3.26	-0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.45	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	3.71	-0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.66	14.05	-3.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VB vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VB Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VB and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VB	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59	2.53	-0.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.79	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.67	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.52	-0.08

Drawdowns

VB vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VB drawdown since its inception was -59.56%, which is greater than FNDF's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VB and FNDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	VB	FNDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.56%	-40.14%	-19.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.98%	-10.60%	+1.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.36%	-13.89%	-11.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.15%	-25.56%	-2.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.05%	-40.14%	-1.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.04%	-3.84%	+1.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.43%	-7.64%	-0.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.44%	2.80%	-0.36%

Volatility

VB vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) is 4.62%, while Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that VB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VB	FNDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.62%	5.97%	-1.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.97%	13.19%	-1.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.45%	15.60%	+0.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.77%	16.28%	+4.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.44%	17.71%	+3.73%

VB vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

VB has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VB vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than FNDF's 2.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	2.93%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	1.21%	1.33%	1.30%	1.55%	1.59%	1.24%	1.14%	1.39%	1.67%	1.35%	1.50%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VB and FNDF in my portfolio?

VB and FNDF have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VB or FNDF?

FNDF has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to VB (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VB dropped -59.56% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

Which ETF is better, VB or FNDF?

On 10-year performance, FNDF leads with 11.78% vs 11.18% for VB. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VB has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VB or FNDF?

Over the 10-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 11.78% return vs 11.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VB or FNDF?

VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VB or FNDF?

FNDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 1.21% for VB.

What is the main difference between VB and FNDF?

VB is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while FNDF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index, while FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VB and 0.25% for FNDF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.