PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
V vs. CW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

V vs. CW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Visa Inc. (V) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, V achieves a -7.29% return, which is significantly lower than CW's 38.43% return. Over the past 10 years, V has underperformed CW with an annualized return of 16.26%, while CW has yielded a comparatively higher 25.25% annualized return.


V

1D
0.44%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
-7.29%
6M
-6.26%
1Y
-7.50%
3Y*
13.11%
5Y*
7.92%
10Y*
16.26%

CW

1D
0.64%
1M
7.03%
YTD
38.43%
6M
39.42%
1Y
61.45%
3Y*
63.27%
5Y*
43.89%
10Y*
25.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

V vs. CW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
V
Visa Inc.
-7.29%11.76%22.32%26.31%-3.40%-0.31%17.12%43.33%16.49%47.18%
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
38.43%55.66%59.73%33.98%21.03%19.86%-16.83%38.70%-15.79%24.56%

Correlation

The correlation between V and CW is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2008

0.42

The correlation between V and CW shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

V:

$15.24

CW:

$13.64

PE Ratio

V:

21.25

CW:

55.91

PEG Ratio

V:

1.30

CW:

3.05

PS Ratio

V:

10.98

CW:

7.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

V:

$43.03B

CW:

$3.61B

Gross Profit (TTM)

V:

$16.94B

CW:

$1.34B

EBITDA (TTM)

V:

$27.63B

CW:

$745.31M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

V vs. CW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

V
V Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
V Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
V Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
V Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
V Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

CW
CW Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CW Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CW Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

V vs. CW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Visa Inc. (V) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VCWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.31

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.44

4.76

-5.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.94

13.83

-14.77

V vs. CW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current V Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the CW Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of V and CW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

V vs. CW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum V drawdown since its inception was -51.90%, smaller than the maximum CW drawdown of -59.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V and CW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.90%

-59.19%

+7.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.18%

-12.97%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.38%

-27.21%

+6.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.60%

-27.21%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.36%

-48.73%

+12.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.57%

0.00%

-12.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-13.89%

+5.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.01%

4.46%

+3.55%

Volatility

V vs. CW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Visa Inc. (V) is 5.54%, while Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) has a volatility of 10.42%. This indicates that V experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.54%

10.42%

-4.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.52%

25.90%

-9.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.83%

33.02%

-11.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.82%

27.89%

-5.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.46%

30.32%

-5.86%

Dividends

V vs. CW - Dividend Comparison

V's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than CW's 0.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
0.16%0.17%0.23%0.35%0.45%0.51%0.58%0.47%0.59%0.46%0.53%0.76%
V
Visa Inc.
0.80%0.70%0.68%0.72%0.76%0.62%0.56%0.56%0.67%0.61%0.75%0.64%

Financials

V vs. CW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Visa Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
11.23B
913.69M
(V) Total Revenue
(CW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

V vs. CW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Visa Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
-79.3%
36.3%
Portfolio components
V - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visa Inc. reported a gross profit of -8.90B and revenue of 11.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -79.3%.

CW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a gross profit of 331.48M and revenue of 913.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.

V - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visa Inc. reported an operating income of 7.23B and revenue of 11.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 64.4%.

CW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported an operating income of 160.42M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.

V - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visa Inc. reported a net income of 6.02B and revenue of 11.23B, resulting in a net margin of 53.6%.

CW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a net income of 128.19M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


V and CW have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CW has higher volatility (10.42%) compared to V (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, V dropped -51.90% vs CW's -59.19%.

CW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for V and CW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer