UTWO vs. EMLC
Compare and contrast key facts about US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO) and VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC).
UTWO and EMLC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UTWO is a passively managed fund by US Benchmark Series that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA Current 2 Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Aug 8, 2022. EMLC is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index Emerging Markets Global Core Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2010. Both UTWO and EMLC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
UTWO vs. EMLC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UTWO vs. EMLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTWO US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF | 0.25% | 4.79% | 3.71% | 3.45% | -0.81% |
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | -1.86% | 18.81% | -2.97% | 11.18% | 1.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTWO achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly higher than EMLC's -1.86% return.
UTWO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 3.47%
- 3Y*
- 3.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMLC
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -5.14%
- YTD
- -1.86%
- 6M
- 1.38%
- 1Y
- 11.82%
- 3Y*
- 6.15%
- 5Y*
- 1.72%
- 10Y*
- 1.81%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UTWO vs. EMLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTWO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EMLC's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UTWO vs. EMLC — Risk / Return Rank
UTWO
EMLC
UTWO vs. EMLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO) and VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UTWO | EMLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.31 | 1.68 | +0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.69 | 2.28 | +1.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.33 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | 1.95 | +1.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.93 | 8.57 | +5.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UTWO | EMLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 1.68 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.49 | 0.09 | +1.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between UTWO and EMLC is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
UTWO vs. EMLC - Dividend Comparison
UTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than EMLC's 6.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTWO US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF | 3.48% | 3.63% | 4.22% | 4.39% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 5.59% | 5.91% | 6.55% | 5.97% | 5.54% | 5.25% | 4.90% | 6.25% | 6.50% | 5.34% | 5.32% | 6.25% |
Drawdowns
UTWO vs. EMLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTWO drawdown since its inception was -2.04%, smaller than the maximum EMLC drawdown of -32.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTWO and EMLC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTWO | EMLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -32.43% | +30.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.90% | -6.19% | +5.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -6.92% | +6.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.49% | -14.48% | +13.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.25% | 1.41% | -1.16% |
Volatility
UTWO vs. EMLC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO) is 0.54%, while VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) has a volatility of 4.03%. This indicates that UTWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UTWO | EMLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.54% | 4.03% | -3.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.86% | 5.04% | -4.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51% | 7.08% | -5.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.10% | 9.11% | -7.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.10% | 10.13% | -8.03% |