UTWO vs. MUST
Compare and contrast key facts about US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO) and Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST).
UTWO and MUST are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UTWO is a passively managed fund by US Benchmark Series that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA Current 2 Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Aug 8, 2022. MUST is a passively managed fund by Ameriprise Financial that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Beta Advantage Multi-Sector Municipal Bond Index. It was launched on Oct 10, 2018. Both UTWO and MUST are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UTWO or MUST.
Correlation
The correlation between UTWO and MUST is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
UTWO vs. MUST - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
UTWO:
2.98
MUST:
0.14
UTWO:
4.77
MUST:
0.25
UTWO:
1.62
MUST:
1.03
UTWO:
4.80
MUST:
0.16
UTWO:
12.85
MUST:
0.63
UTWO:
0.40%
MUST:
1.66%
UTWO:
1.75%
MUST:
6.84%
UTWO:
-2.04%
MUST:
-13.83%
UTWO:
-0.67%
MUST:
-3.40%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTWO achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly higher than MUST's 0.01% return.
UTWO
1.69%
0.16%
2.33%
5.18%
N/A
N/A
MUST
0.01%
2.67%
-0.73%
0.94%
1.44%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UTWO vs. MUST - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTWO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MUST's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UTWO vs. MUST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
UTWO
MUST
UTWO vs. MUST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO) and Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
UTWO vs. MUST - Dividend Comparison
UTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than MUST's 3.25% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTWO US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF | 4.10% | 4.22% | 4.39% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MUST Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF | 3.25% | 3.13% | 2.50% | 1.76% | 1.62% | 2.33% | 2.47% | 0.55% |
Drawdowns
UTWO vs. MUST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTWO drawdown since its inception was -2.04%, smaller than the maximum MUST drawdown of -13.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTWO and MUST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
UTWO vs. MUST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO) is 0.64%, while Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST) has a volatility of 2.45%. This indicates that UTWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...