PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTWO vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTWO vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTWO achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -13.49% return.


UTWO

1D
0.09%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.33%
6M
0.51%
1Y
2.73%
3Y*
3.85%
5Y*
10Y*

SLV

1D
-5.40%
1M
-18.48%
YTD
-13.49%
6M
-14.05%
1Y
69.08%
3Y*
39.38%
5Y*
18.31%
10Y*
12.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTWO vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
UTWO
US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF
0.33%4.79%3.71%3.45%-0.84%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-13.49%144.66%20.89%-1.09%15.71%

Correlation

The correlation between UTWO and SLV is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTWO vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTWO
UTWO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
UTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
UTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTWO vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UTWOSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.25

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

1.47

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.64

3.16

+7.48

UTWO vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTWO and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UTWO vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTWO drawdown since its inception was -2.04%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTWO and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTWOSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.04%

-76.28%

+74.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.90%

-47.23%

+46.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.08%

-47.23%

+46.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-47.23%

+46.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.48%

-44.65%

+44.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.26%

21.91%

-21.65%

Volatility

UTWO vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO) is 0.48%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 14.34%. This indicates that UTWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTWOSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.48%

14.34%

-13.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.00%

59.27%

-58.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37%

60.33%

-58.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.07%

36.59%

-34.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.07%

32.09%

-30.02%

UTWO vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTWO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

UTWO vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

UTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UTWO
US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF
3.50%3.63%4.22%4.39%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTWO and SLV have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (14.34%) compared to UTWO (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTWO dropped -2.04% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 3-year performance, SLV leads with 39.38% vs 3.85% for UTWO. On fees, UTWO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, UTWO has been the lower-risk option at 0.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SLV has performed better with a 39.38% return vs 3.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UTWO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

UTWO has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

UTWO is categorized as Government Bonds, while SLV is Silver. UTWO tracks ICE BofA Current 2 Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UTWO and 0.50% for SLV.

UTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTWO and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer