PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTEN vs. ^TNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UTEN vs. ^TNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) and Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTEN achieves a -0.55% return, which is significantly lower than ^TNX's 7.54% return.


UTEN

1D
0.14%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
-0.55%
6M
-0.80%
1Y
3.58%
3Y*
1.92%
5Y*
10Y*

^TNX

1D
-0.31%
1M
1.38%
YTD
7.54%
6M
8.98%
1Y
2.57%
3Y*
6.63%
5Y*
23.47%
10Y*
10.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTEN vs. ^TNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
UTEN
US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF
-0.55%7.82%-1.67%3.18%-7.79%
^TNX
Treasury Yield 10 Years
7.54%-8.97%18.29%-0.34%38.68%

Correlation

The correlation between UTEN and ^TNX is -0.95, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2022

-0.96

The correlation between UTEN and ^TNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.96 to -0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTEN vs. ^TNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTEN
UTEN Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
UTEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTEN Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
UTEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTEN Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

^TNX
^TNX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
^TNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^TNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
^TNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
^TNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
^TNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTEN vs. ^TNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) and Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTEN^TNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.04

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

0.21

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.36

0.37

+1.99

UTEN vs. ^TNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTEN Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is higher than the ^TNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTEN and ^TNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTEN^TNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

0.17

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

-0.02

+0.03

Drawdowns

UTEN vs. ^TNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTEN drawdown since its inception was -13.36%, smaller than the maximum ^TNX drawdown of -93.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTEN and ^TNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTEN^TNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.36%

-93.78%

+80.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.57%

-12.35%

+7.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.60%

-27.41%

+18.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.91%

-44.20%

+41.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-51.34%

+46.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

6.97%

-5.45%

Volatility

UTEN vs. ^TNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) is 1.71%, while Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that UTEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^TNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTEN^TNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.71%

5.04%

-3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.66%

10.62%

-6.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.24%

15.51%

-10.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.05%

32.43%

-24.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.05%

47.98%

-39.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTEN and ^TNX have a correlation of -0.95, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^TNX has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to UTEN (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTEN dropped -13.36% vs ^TNX's -93.78%.

UTEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTEN and ^TNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer