PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
UTEN vs. BINC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

UTEN vs. BINC

Last updated May 21, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) and BlackRock Flexible Income ETF (BINC).

UTEN and BINC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UTEN is a passively managed fund by US Benchmark Series that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA Current 10 Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Aug 8, 2022. BINC is an actively managed fund by Blackrock. It was launched on Sep 19, 2023.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UTEN or BINC.

Correlation

The correlation between UTEN and BINC is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

UTEN vs. BINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) and BlackRock Flexible Income ETF (BINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

UTEN:

0.52

BINC:

2.29

Sortino Ratio

UTEN:

0.69

BINC:

3.12

Omega Ratio

UTEN:

1.08

BINC:

1.50

Calmar Ratio

UTEN:

0.37

BINC:

2.76

Martin Ratio

UTEN:

0.88

BINC:

12.13

Ulcer Index

UTEN:

3.66%

BINC:

0.54%

Daily Std Dev

UTEN:

7.25%

BINC:

2.86%

Max Drawdown

UTEN:

-13.36%

BINC:

-2.37%

Current Drawdown

UTEN:

-4.26%

BINC:

-0.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTEN achieves a 2.35% return, which is significantly higher than BINC's 2.11% return.

UTEN

YTD

2.35%

1M

-0.79%

6M

1.45%

1Y

3.76%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BINC

YTD

2.11%

1M

1.34%

6M

2.48%

1Y

6.51%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF

BlackRock Flexible Income ETF

UTEN vs. BINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTEN has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BINC's 0.40% expense ratio.

BINC
BlackRock Flexible Income ETF
UTEN
US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF

Risk-Adjusted Performance

UTEN vs. BINC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UTEN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UTEN is 4040
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UTEN is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UTEN is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UTEN is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UTEN is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UTEN is 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
BINC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BINC is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BINC is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BINC is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BINC is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BINC is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BINC is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

UTEN vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) and BlackRock Flexible Income ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current UTEN Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the BINC Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTEN and BINC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading data...

Dividends

UTEN vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison

UTEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, less than BINC's 6.47% yield.

TTM202420232022
UTEN
US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF		4.19%4.13%3.62%1.39%
BINC
BlackRock Flexible Income ETF		6.47%6.14%3.13%0.00%

Drawdowns

UTEN vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTEN drawdown since its inception was -13.36%, which is greater than BINC's maximum drawdown of -2.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTEN and BINC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Loading data...

Volatility

UTEN vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison

US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) has a higher volatility of 1.97% compared to BlackRock Flexible Income ETF (BINC) at 0.72%. This indicates that UTEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading data...