PortfoliosLab logo
UTEN vs. BINC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between UTEN and BINC is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.1

Performance

UTEN vs. BINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) and BlackRock Flexible Income ETF (BINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
2.72%
14.97%
UTEN
BINC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

UTEN:

0.95

BINC:

2.41

Sortino Ratio

UTEN:

1.41

BINC:

3.30

Omega Ratio

UTEN:

1.16

BINC:

1.53

Calmar Ratio

UTEN:

0.70

BINC:

2.94

Martin Ratio

UTEN:

1.91

BINC:

13.00

Ulcer Index

UTEN:

3.56%

BINC:

0.54%

Daily Std Dev

UTEN:

7.20%

BINC:

2.90%

Max Drawdown

UTEN:

-13.36%

BINC:

-2.37%

Current Drawdown

UTEN:

-2.90%

BINC:

-0.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTEN achieves a 3.82% return, which is significantly higher than BINC's 1.53% return.


UTEN

YTD

3.82%

1M

1.07%

6M

1.91%

1Y

7.63%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BINC

YTD

1.53%

1M

0.11%

6M

2.09%

1Y

7.31%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UTEN vs. BINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTEN has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BINC's 0.40% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for BINC: current value is 0.40%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
BINC: 0.40%
Expense ratio chart for UTEN: current value is 0.15%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
UTEN: 0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

UTEN vs. BINC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTEN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UTEN is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UTEN is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UTEN is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UTEN is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UTEN is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UTEN is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

BINC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BINC is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BINC is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BINC is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BINC is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BINC is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BINC is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

UTEN vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) and BlackRock Flexible Income ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for UTEN, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
UTEN: 0.95
BINC: 2.41
The chart of Sortino ratio for UTEN, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
UTEN: 1.41
BINC: 3.30
The chart of Omega ratio for UTEN, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
UTEN: 1.16
BINC: 1.53
The chart of Calmar ratio for UTEN, currently valued at 0.88, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
UTEN: 0.88
BINC: 2.94
The chart of Martin ratio for UTEN, currently valued at 1.91, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
UTEN: 1.91
BINC: 13.00

The current UTEN Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the BINC Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTEN and BINC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.95
2.41
UTEN
BINC

Dividends

UTEN vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison

UTEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, less than BINC's 6.47% yield.


TTM202420232022
UTEN
US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF
4.05%4.13%3.62%1.39%
BINC
BlackRock Flexible Income ETF
6.47%6.13%3.13%0.00%

Drawdowns

UTEN vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTEN drawdown since its inception was -13.36%, which is greater than BINC's maximum drawdown of -2.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTEN and BINC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-2.68%
-0.48%
UTEN
BINC

Volatility

UTEN vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison

US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) has a higher volatility of 2.80% compared to BlackRock Flexible Income ETF (BINC) at 2.07%. This indicates that UTEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
2.80%
2.07%
UTEN
BINC