UTEN vs. IAU
Compare and contrast key facts about US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU).
UTEN and IAU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UTEN is a passively managed fund by US Benchmark Series that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA Current 10 Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Aug 8, 2022. IAU is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Gold Bullion. It was launched on Jan 28, 2005. Both UTEN and IAU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UTEN or IAU.
Correlation
The correlation between UTEN and IAU is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
UTEN vs. IAU - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
UTEN:
0.91
IAU:
2.43
UTEN:
1.35
IAU:
3.23
UTEN:
1.16
IAU:
1.42
UTEN:
0.71
IAU:
5.02
UTEN:
1.83
IAU:
13.51
UTEN:
3.58%
IAU:
3.02%
UTEN:
7.21%
IAU:
16.84%
UTEN:
-13.36%
IAU:
-45.14%
UTEN:
-3.65%
IAU:
-5.60%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTEN achieves a 3.01% return, which is significantly lower than IAU's 23.15% return.
UTEN
3.01%
-1.07%
2.13%
5.63%
N/A
N/A
IAU
23.15%
3.43%
18.11%
40.00%
13.48%
10.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UTEN vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTEN has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UTEN vs. IAU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
UTEN
IAU
UTEN vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UTEN vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison
UTEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
UTEN US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF | 3.77% | 4.13% | 3.62% | 1.39% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UTEN vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTEN drawdown since its inception was -13.36%, smaller than the maximum IAU drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTEN and IAU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UTEN vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) is 2.76%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 8.71%. This indicates that UTEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.