UTEN vs. IAU
Compare and contrast key facts about US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU).
UTEN and IAU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UTEN is a passively managed fund by US Benchmark Series that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA Current 10 Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Aug 8, 2022. IAU is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Gold Bullion. It was launched on Jan 28, 2005. Both UTEN and IAU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UTEN or IAU.
Key characteristics
| UTEN | IAU | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -0.10% | 32.74% |
| 1Y Return | 6.64% | 38.42% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.78 | 2.64 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.16 | 3.54 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.14 | 1.46 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.55 | 5.46 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.24 | 17.21 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.67% | 2.17% |
| Daily Std Dev | 7.64% | 14.16% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.36% | -45.14% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.98% | -1.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTEN and IAU is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
UTEN vs. IAU - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, UTEN achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than IAU's 32.74% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UTEN vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTEN has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UTEN vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UTEN vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison
UTEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|
UTEN US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF | 4.09% | 3.62% | 1.39% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UTEN vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTEN drawdown since its inception was -13.36%, smaller than the maximum IAU drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTEN and IAU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UTEN vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) is 1.71%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that UTEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.