PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTEN vs. PONAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UTEN vs. PONAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) and PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UTEN vs. PONAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
UTEN
US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF
-0.06%7.82%-1.67%3.18%-7.79%
PONAX
PIMCO Income Fund Class A
-1.42%10.63%5.02%8.96%-2.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTEN achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly higher than PONAX's -1.42% return.


UTEN

1D
0.27%
1M
-2.43%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
0.86%
1Y
3.78%
3Y*
1.65%
5Y*
10Y*

PONAX

1D
0.47%
1M
-3.24%
YTD
-1.42%
6M
0.98%
1Y
5.68%
3Y*
6.79%
5Y*
3.00%
10Y*
4.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UTEN vs. PONAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTEN has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PONAX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UTEN vs. PONAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTEN
UTEN Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
UTEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTEN Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
UTEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTEN Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

PONAX
PONAX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PONAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PONAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PONAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
PONAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PONAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTEN vs. PONAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) and PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTENPONAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

1.48

-0.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.95

2.11

-1.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.28

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

1.76

-0.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.63

7.07

-4.44

UTEN vs. PONAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTEN Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the PONAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTEN and PONAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTENPONAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

1.48

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

1.47

-1.44

Correlation

The correlation between UTEN and PONAX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

UTEN vs. PONAX - Dividend Comparison

UTEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, less than PONAX's 5.20% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UTEN
US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF
4.44%4.11%4.13%3.62%1.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PONAX
PIMCO Income Fund Class A
5.20%5.61%5.86%5.86%4.66%3.62%4.48%5.42%5.24%4.97%5.13%7.45%

Drawdowns

UTEN vs. PONAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTEN drawdown since its inception was -13.36%, roughly equal to the maximum PONAX drawdown of -13.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTEN and PONAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UTENPONAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.36%

-13.64%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.87%

-3.69%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.43%

-3.24%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-1.80%

-3.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

0.92%

+0.61%

Volatility

UTEN vs. PONAX - Volatility Comparison

US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) has a higher volatility of 2.09% compared to PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX) at 1.88%. This indicates that UTEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PONAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UTENPONAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.09%

1.88%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.54%

2.61%

+0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.89%

4.24%

+1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.17%

4.72%

+3.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.17%

4.16%

+4.01%