USXF vs. DMXF
USXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF) and DMXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USXF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Choice ESG Screened Index, while DMXF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Choice ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USXF returned 15.70%/yr vs 6.83%/yr for DMXF. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USXF charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for DMXF.
Performance
USXF vs. DMXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USXF achieves a 20.76% return, which is significantly higher than DMXF's 11.52% return.
USXF
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 10.32%
- YTD
- 20.76%
- 6M
- 21.06%
- 1Y
- 35.21%
- 3Y*
- 27.38%
- 5Y*
- 15.70%
- 10Y*
- —
DMXF
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 5.69%
- YTD
- 11.52%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 19.38%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.83%
- 10Y*
- —
USXF vs. DMXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF | 20.76% | 16.97% | 26.16% | 31.65% | -21.20% | 27.14% | 24.04% |
DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF | 11.52% | 22.07% | 3.99% | 20.52% | -19.25% | 10.90% | 23.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between USXF and DMXF is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020 | 0.73 |
The correlation between USXF and DMXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
USXF vs. DMXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USXF
DMXF
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Technology
USXF
DMXF
Financial Services
USXF
DMXF
Industrials
USXF
DMXF
Consumer Cyclical
USXF
DMXF
Healthcare
USXF
DMXF
Real Estate
USXF
DMXF
Communication Services
USXF
DMXF
Basic Materials
USXF
DMXF
Utilities
USXF
DMXF
Consumer Defensive
USXF
DMXF
Energy
USXF
DMXF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USXF vs. DMXF — Risk / Return Rank
USXF
DMXF
USXF vs. DMXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF (USXF) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USXF | DMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.22 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | 1.64 | +1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.97 | 6.16 | +7.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USXF | DMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 1.21 | +0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.39 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 0.65 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
USXF vs. DMXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USXF drawdown since its inception was -29.54%, smaller than the maximum DMXF drawdown of -34.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USXF and DMXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USXF | DMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.54% | -34.52% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.19% | -11.84% | +1.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.93% | -16.54% | -4.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.54% | -34.52% | +4.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -0.56% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.42% | -7.67% | +1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 3.15% | -0.62% |
Volatility
USXF vs. DMXF - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF (USXF) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) at 5.13%. This indicates that USXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USXF | DMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 5.13% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.82% | 13.29% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.13% | 16.07% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.55% | 17.68% | +1.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.18% | 17.25% | +1.93% |
USXF vs. DMXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
USXF has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DMXF's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USXF vs. DMXF - Dividend Comparison
USXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than DMXF's 4.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF | 4.35% | 4.85% | 2.92% | 2.29% | 2.37% | 1.91% | 0.31% |
USXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF | 0.80% | 0.93% | 1.00% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.86% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USXF and DMXF have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USXF has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to DMXF (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USXF dropped -29.54% vs DMXF's -34.52%.
On 5-year performance, USXF leads with 15.70% vs 6.83% for DMXF. On fees, USXF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, DMXF has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USXF has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 6.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USXF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for DMXF.
DMXF has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 0.80% for USXF.
USXF is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DMXF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. USXF tracks MSCI USA Choice ESG Screened Index, while DMXF tracks MSCI EAFE Choice ESG Screened Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for USXF and 0.12% for DMXF.
USXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USXF and DMXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer