USXF vs. VOO
USXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USXF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Choice ESG Screened Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USXF returned 15.57%/yr vs 13.58%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USXF charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
USXF vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USXF achieves a 21.17% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.75% return.
USXF
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 21.17%
- 6M
- 20.48%
- 1Y
- 36.70%
- 3Y*
- 26.99%
- 5Y*
- 15.57%
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
USXF vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF | 21.17% | 16.97% | 26.16% | 31.65% | -21.20% | 27.14% | 23.07% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.75% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 21.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between USXF and VOO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2020 | 0.93 |
The correlation between USXF and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
USXF vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USXF
VOO
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Technology
USXF
VOO
Financial Services
USXF
VOO
Industrials
USXF
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
USXF
VOO
Healthcare
USXF
VOO
Real Estate
USXF
VOO
Basic Materials
USXF
VOO
Communication Services
USXF
VOO
Utilities
USXF
VOO
Consumer Defensive
USXF
VOO
Energy
USXF
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USXF vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
USXF
VOO
USXF vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF (USXF) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USXF | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.39 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 3.02 | +0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.89 | 13.58 | +0.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USXF vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USXF drawdown since its inception was -29.54%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USXF and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USXF | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.54% | -33.99% | +4.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.19% | -8.90% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.93% | -18.69% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.54% | -24.52% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -1.74% | +1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.39% | -3.68% | -2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 1.98% | +0.67% |
Volatility
USXF vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF (USXF) has a higher volatility of 7.80% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that USXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USXF | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.80% | 4.60% | +3.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.29% | 9.73% | +4.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.45% | 12.39% | +5.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.79% | 16.90% | +2.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.32% | 18.05% | +1.27% |
USXF vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
USXF has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USXF vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
USXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than VOO's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF | 0.79% | 0.93% | 1.00% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.86% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, USXF and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
USXF has higher volatility (7.80%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USXF dropped -29.54% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 5-year performance, USXF leads with 15.57% vs 13.58% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USXF has performed better with a 15.57% return vs 13.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for USXF.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.79% for USXF.
USXF is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. USXF tracks MSCI USA Choice ESG Screened Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for USXF and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USXF and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer