USVM vs. VAMO
USVM (VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF) and VAMO (Cambria Value and Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. USVM is passively managed, while VAMO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, USVM returned 9.74%/yr vs 8.12%/yr for VAMO. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USVM charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for VAMO.
Performance
USVM vs. VAMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USVM achieves a 15.26% return, which is significantly higher than VAMO's 3.15% return.
USVM
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 15.26%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 30.42%
- 3Y*
- 19.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.74%
- 10Y*
- —
VAMO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- 3.15%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- 1Y
- 18.13%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 8.12%
- 10Y*
- 5.64%
USVM vs. VAMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 15.26% | 10.56% | 16.59% | 18.90% | -13.23% | 24.44% | 11.56% | 21.65% | -9.39% | 2.21% |
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF | 3.15% | 16.51% | 6.11% | 5.58% | 8.55% | 32.16% | -4.92% | -4.63% | -11.43% | -0.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between USVM and VAMO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | 0.68 |
The correlation between USVM and VAMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (5 years) to 0.80 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
USVM vs. VAMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USVM
VAMO
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Financial Services
USVM
VAMO
Industrials
USVM
VAMO
Real Estate
USVM
VAMO
-
Technology
USVM
VAMO
Consumer Cyclical
USVM
VAMO
Healthcare
USVM
VAMO
Utilities
USVM
VAMO
Consumer Defensive
USVM
VAMO
Energy
USVM
VAMO
Communication Services
USVM
VAMO
Basic Materials
USVM
VAMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USVM vs. VAMO — Risk / Return Rank
USVM
VAMO
USVM vs. VAMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) and Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USVM | VAMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.28 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 3.28 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.76 | 9.47 | +4.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USVM | VAMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 1.63 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.47 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.24 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
USVM vs. VAMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USVM drawdown since its inception was -42.38%, roughly equal to the maximum VAMO drawdown of -41.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USVM and VAMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USVM | VAMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.38% | -41.84% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.36% | -5.55% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.34% | -11.61% | -12.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.27% | -17.25% | -8.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | -2.76% | +2.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.90% | -9.98% | +2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 1.92% | +0.30% |
Volatility
USVM vs. VAMO - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) at 2.97%. This indicates that USVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USVM | VAMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | 2.97% | +1.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.73% | 7.66% | +3.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.93% | 11.19% | +3.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 17.34% | +2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.01% | 18.09% | +3.92% |
USVM vs. VAMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
USVM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than VAMO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
USVM vs. VAMO - Dividend Comparison
USVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than VAMO's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 1.76% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 0.70% | 1.21% | 1.77% | 1.43% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF | 0.63% | 1.41% | 0.84% | 1.35% | 1.10% | 1.07% | 1.03% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.35% | 0.56% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USVM and VAMO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USVM has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to VAMO (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USVM dropped -42.38% vs VAMO's -41.84%.
On 5-year performance, USVM leads with 9.74% vs 8.12% for VAMO. On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, VAMO has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USVM has performed better with a 9.74% return vs 8.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for VAMO.
USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.63% for VAMO.
They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for USVM and 0.65% for VAMO.
USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USVM and VAMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer