ULVM vs. USMV
ULVM (VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF) and USMV (iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ULVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index, while USMV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ULVM returned 11.59%/yr vs 7.76%/yr for USMV. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ULVM charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USMV.
Performance
ULVM vs. USMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ULVM achieves a 14.99% return, which is significantly higher than USMV's 3.37% return.
ULVM
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 14.99%
- 6M
- 15.51%
- 1Y
- 29.88%
- 3Y*
- 21.32%
- 5Y*
- 11.59%
- 10Y*
- —
USMV
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 2.48%
- YTD
- 3.37%
- 6M
- 3.65%
- 1Y
- 5.11%
- 3Y*
- 12.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.76%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
ULVM vs. USMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 14.99% | 15.84% | 19.76% | 10.16% | -9.04% | 31.06% | 3.51% | 22.08% | -12.07% | 4.30% |
USMV iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor ETF | 3.37% | 7.65% | 15.74% | 10.33% | -9.43% | 20.85% | 5.64% | 27.69% | 1.33% | 3.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between ULVM and USMV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | 0.82 |
The correlation between ULVM and USMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ULVM vs. USMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ULVM
USMV
Financial Services
Technology
Utilities
Industrials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
ULVM
USMV
Technology
ULVM
USMV
Utilities
ULVM
USMV
Industrials
ULVM
USMV
Healthcare
ULVM
USMV
Real Estate
ULVM
USMV
Consumer Cyclical
ULVM
USMV
Consumer Defensive
ULVM
USMV
Basic Materials
ULVM
USMV
Communication Services
ULVM
USMV
Energy
ULVM
USMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ULVM vs. USMV — Risk / Return Rank
ULVM
USMV
ULVM vs. USMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor ETF (USMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ULVM | USMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.80 | 0.61 | +2.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.92 | 0.91 | +3.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.11 | +0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.64 | 0.82 | +3.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.27 | 2.74 | +16.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ULVM | USMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 0.61 | +2.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.63 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.87 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
ULVM vs. USMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ULVM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, which is greater than USMV's maximum drawdown of -33.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULVM and USMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ULVM | USMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.71% | -33.10% | -7.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -6.46% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.14% | -9.36% | -8.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.77% | -17.93% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.49% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.75% | -2.88% | -2.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 1.93% | -0.37% |
Volatility
ULVM vs. USMV - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) has a higher volatility of 3.13% compared to iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor ETF (USMV) at 2.27%. This indicates that ULVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ULVM | USMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 2.27% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.03% | 5.93% | +2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.74% | 8.47% | +2.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.48% | 12.35% | +3.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.86% | 14.51% | +4.35% |
ULVM vs. USMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ULVM has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than USMV's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ULVM vs. USMV - Dividend Comparison
ULVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than USMV's 1.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 1.57% | 1.81% | 1.57% | 1.94% | 1.91% | 1.36% | 1.51% | 1.88% | 1.67% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USMV iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor ETF | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.62% | 1.26% | 1.81% | 1.88% | 2.12% | 1.77% | 2.22% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ULVM and USMV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ULVM has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to USMV (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULVM dropped -40.71% vs USMV's -33.10%.
On 5-year performance, ULVM leads with 11.59% vs 7.76% for USMV. On fees, USMV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ULVM has performed better with a 11.59% return vs 7.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USMV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ULVM.
ULVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 1.52% for USMV.
ULVM is categorized as Momentum, while USMV is Large Cap Blend Equities. ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index, while USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ULVM and 0.15% for USMV.
ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ULVM and USMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer