PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USVM vs. EEMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USVM vs. EEMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USVM achieves a 15.26% return, which is significantly lower than EEMO's 40.25% return.


USVM

1D
-0.40%
1M
2.60%
YTD
15.26%
6M
15.00%
1Y
30.42%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*

EEMO

1D
-1.32%
1M
18.59%
YTD
40.25%
6M
41.33%
1Y
57.41%
3Y*
25.30%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
8.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USVM vs. EEMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
15.26%10.56%16.59%18.90%-13.23%24.44%11.56%21.65%-9.39%2.21%
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
40.25%10.99%9.88%13.90%-18.73%-5.57%9.66%21.17%-17.24%4.38%

Correlation

The correlation between USVM and EEMO is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.56

The correlation between USVM and EEMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

USVM vs. EEMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USVM
EEMO

Financial Services

22.0%
18.0%

Industrials

12.1%
11.5%

Real Estate

11.9%
0.5%

Technology

11.6%
43.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
3.2%

Healthcare

11.0%
3.0%

Utilities

6.4%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
1.2%

Energy

4.4%
2.5%

Communication Services

2.8%
1.5%

Basic Materials

1.8%
12.9%

Financial Services

USVM
22.0%
EEMO
18.0%

Industrials

USVM
12.1%
EEMO
11.5%

Real Estate

USVM
11.9%
EEMO
0.5%

Technology

USVM
11.6%
EEMO
43.8%

Consumer Cyclical

USVM
11.1%
EEMO
3.2%

Healthcare

USVM
11.0%
EEMO
3.0%

Utilities

USVM
6.4%
EEMO
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

USVM
5.0%
EEMO
1.2%

Energy

USVM
4.4%
EEMO
2.5%

Communication Services

USVM
2.8%
EEMO
1.5%

Basic Materials

USVM
1.8%
EEMO
12.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USVM vs. EEMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USVM
USVM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
USVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
USVM Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
USVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
USVM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

EEMO
EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USVM vs. EEMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USVMEEMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.05

2.36

-0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.98

3.28

-0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.46

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

3.91

-0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.76

15.67

-1.91

USVM vs. EEMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the EEMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USVM and EEMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USVMEEMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

2.36

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.37

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.13

+0.36

Drawdowns

USVM vs. EEMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USVM drawdown since its inception was -42.38%, smaller than the maximum EEMO drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USVM and EEMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USVMEEMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.38%

-48.47%

+6.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.36%

-14.75%

+6.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.34%

-26.06%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.27%

-34.03%

+8.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-1.32%

+0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.90%

-20.17%

+12.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

3.67%

-1.45%

Volatility

USVM vs. EEMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) is 4.50%, while Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a volatility of 14.32%. This indicates that USVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USVMEEMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

14.32%

-9.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.73%

22.10%

-11.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.93%

24.45%

-9.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.65%

19.33%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.01%

21.59%

+0.42%

USVM vs. EEMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

USVM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than EEMO's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

USVM vs. EEMO - Dividend Comparison

USVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than EEMO's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.64%2.31%2.57%3.65%3.82%1.51%1.53%2.13%13.10%5.13%1.55%2.92%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
1.76%1.84%1.75%1.63%1.43%0.70%1.21%1.77%1.43%0.65%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USVM and EEMO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMO has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to USVM (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USVM dropped -42.38% vs EEMO's -48.47%.

On 5-year performance, USVM leads with 9.74% vs 7.19% for EEMO. On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, USVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USVM has performed better with a 9.74% return vs 7.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for EEMO.

USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.64% for EEMO.

USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index, while EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for USVM and 0.31% for EEMO.

EEMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USVM and EEMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer