PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USVM vs. CDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USVM vs. CDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) and VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USVM achieves a 18.75% return, which is significantly higher than CDL's 13.80% return.


USVM

1D
0.05%
1M
4.06%
YTD
18.75%
6M
16.97%
1Y
32.76%
3Y*
20.77%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*

CDL

1D
1.03%
1M
0.80%
YTD
13.80%
6M
13.70%
1Y
20.88%
3Y*
15.81%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
11.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USVM vs. CDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
18.75%10.56%16.59%18.90%-13.23%24.44%11.56%21.65%-9.39%2.06%
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
13.80%9.04%15.58%3.03%-0.45%33.42%-3.35%26.38%-5.86%4.27%

Correlation

The correlation between USVM and CDL is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017

0.75

The correlation between USVM and CDL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

USVM vs. CDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USVM
CDL

Financial Services

21.6%
23.1%

Technology

12.5%
8.0%

Industrials

12.4%
2.2%

Real Estate

12.1%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
6.9%

Healthcare

11.3%
6.9%

Utilities

5.9%
23.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
15.8%

Energy

4.0%
9.0%

Communication Services

2.5%
4.4%

Basic Materials

1.6%
0.0%

Financial Services

USVM
21.6%
CDL
23.1%

Technology

USVM
12.5%
CDL
8.0%

Industrials

USVM
12.4%
CDL
2.2%

Real Estate

USVM
12.1%
CDL
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

USVM
11.3%
CDL
6.9%

Healthcare

USVM
11.3%
CDL
6.9%

Utilities

USVM
5.9%
CDL
23.7%

Consumer Defensive

USVM
4.8%
CDL
15.8%

Energy

USVM
4.0%
CDL
9.0%

Communication Services

USVM
2.5%
CDL
4.4%

Basic Materials

USVM
1.6%
CDL
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USVM vs. CDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USVM
USVM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
USVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
USVM Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
USVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
USVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

CDL
CDL Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDL Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
CDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USVM vs. CDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) and VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USVMCDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.36

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

3.70

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.82

13.08

+1.74

USVM vs. CDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the CDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USVM and CDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USVM vs. CDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USVM drawdown since its inception was -42.38%, roughly equal to the maximum CDL drawdown of -41.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USVM and CDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USVMCDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.38%

-41.03%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.36%

-5.66%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.34%

-12.87%

-11.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.27%

-17.28%

-7.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.49%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-4.33%

-3.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

1.60%

+0.62%

Volatility

USVM vs. CDL - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) at 3.47%. This indicates that USVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USVMCDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

3.47%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

7.14%

+3.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.96%

9.98%

+4.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.64%

13.85%

+5.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.97%

17.04%

+4.93%

USVM vs. CDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

USVM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than CDL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

USVM vs. CDL - Dividend Comparison

USVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than CDL's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.13%3.33%3.27%3.61%3.31%2.60%3.32%3.04%3.32%2.87%2.97%1.28%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
1.77%1.84%1.75%1.63%1.43%0.70%1.21%1.77%1.43%0.65%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USVM and CDL have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USVM has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to CDL (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USVM dropped -42.38% vs CDL's -41.03%.

On 5-year performance, CDL leads with 10.12% vs 10.06% for USVM. On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, CDL has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, CDL has performed better with a 10.12% return vs 10.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CDL.

CDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 1.77% for USVM.

USVM is categorized as Momentum, while CDL is Large Cap Value Equities. USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index, while CDL tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for USVM and 0.35% for CDL.

USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USVM and CDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer