PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USSCX vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USSCX vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Science & Technology Fund (USSCX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USSCX achieves a 23.13% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 9.49% return. Over the past 10 years, USSCX has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 15.58%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.26% annualized return.


USSCX

1D
1.97%
1M
14.67%
YTD
23.13%
6M
21.92%
1Y
47.69%
3Y*
28.33%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
15.58%

VUG

1D
-1.23%
1M
6.22%
YTD
9.49%
6M
8.72%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
25.93%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*
18.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USSCX vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USSCX
USAA Science & Technology Fund
23.13%17.93%30.58%34.01%-41.76%-3.45%60.62%37.84%-4.34%36.06%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
9.49%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between USSCX and VUG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.91

The correlation between USSCX and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USSCX vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USSCX
USSCX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
USSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
USSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
USSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
USSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USSCX vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Science & Technology Fund (USSCX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USSCXVUGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.41

1.77

+0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.06

2.40

+0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.31

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

1.69

+1.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.45

5.92

+3.53

USSCX vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USSCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USSCX and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USSCXVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

1.77

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.68

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.85

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.62

-0.27

Drawdowns

USSCX vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USSCX drawdown since its inception was -79.48%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSCX and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USSCXVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.48%

-50.68%

-28.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.19%

-16.53%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.82%

-22.85%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.07%

-35.61%

-16.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.70%

-35.61%

-17.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.51%

+1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.05%

-7.09%

-23.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.24%

4.71%

+0.53%

Volatility

USSCX vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

USAA Science & Technology Fund (USSCX) has a higher volatility of 4.78% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 3.83%. This indicates that USSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USSCXVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

3.83%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.22%

12.11%

+4.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.69%

15.84%

+4.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.70%

22.22%

+6.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.54%

21.44%

+5.10%

USSCX vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

USSCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

USSCX vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

USSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.65%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USSCX
USAA Science & Technology Fund
7.65%9.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%15.49%5.36%27.99%16.68%8.31%4.15%6.54%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.37%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, USSCX and VUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

USSCX has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to VUG (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USSCX dropped -79.48% vs VUG's -50.68%.

USSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USSCX and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer