USMV vs. EFAV
USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) and EFAV (iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USMV is a Low Volatility fund tracking the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while EFAV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, USMV returned 9.69%/yr vs 6.41%/yr for EFAV. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. USMV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EFAV.
Performance
USMV vs. EFAV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USMV achieves a 5.12% return, which is significantly lower than EFAV's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, USMV has outperformed EFAV with an annualized return of 9.69%, while EFAV has yielded a comparatively lower 6.41% annualized return.
USMV
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- 6M
- 3.78%
- YTD
- 5.12%
- 1Y
- 8.05%
- 3Y*
- 11.61%
- 5Y*
- 6.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.67%
EFAV
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- 6M
- 5.55%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 1Y
- 15.74%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- 6.67%
- 10Y*
- 6.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $49.00M | $48.85M | $45.04M | |
| $238.33M | $228.63M | $219.79M |
USMV vs. EFAV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 5.12% | 7.65% | 15.74% | 10.33% | -9.43% | 20.85% | 5.64% | 27.69% | 1.33% | 18.91% |
EFAV iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF | 9.53% | 26.00% | 5.30% | 12.52% | -15.11% | 7.20% | -0.06% | 16.67% | -5.74% | 22.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between USMV and EFAV is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between USMV and EFAV has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
USMV vs. EFAV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USMV
EFAV
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
USMV
EFAV
Healthcare
USMV
EFAV
Financial Services
USMV
EFAV
Consumer Defensive
USMV
EFAV
Utilities
USMV
EFAV
Industrials
USMV
EFAV
Consumer Cyclical
USMV
EFAV
Communication Services
USMV
EFAV
Energy
USMV
EFAV
Real Estate
USMV
EFAV
Basic Materials
USMV
EFAV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USMV vs. EFAV — Risk / Return Rank
USMV
EFAV
USMV vs. EFAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USMV | EFAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.27 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 2.37 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.09 | 5.52 | -1.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USMV vs. EFAV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USMV drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, which is greater than EFAV's maximum drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMV and EFAV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USMV | EFAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.10% | -27.56% | -5.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.46% | -6.66% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.36% | -8.65% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.93% | -27.46% | +9.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.10% | -27.56% | -5.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -1.32% | +1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.86% | -4.76% | +1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 2.86% | -0.88% |
Volatility
USMV vs. EFAV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) is 2.63%, while iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that USMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USMV | EFAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 2.77% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.44% | 8.84% | -2.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.54% | 10.60% | -2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.38% | 11.88% | +0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 13.04% | +1.47% |
USMV vs. EFAV - Expense Ratio Comparison
USMV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAV's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USMV vs. EFAV - Dividend Comparison
USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than EFAV's 3.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAV iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF | 3.08% | 3.20% | 3.24% | 3.08% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 1.33% | 4.19% | 3.34% | 2.45% | 3.94% | 2.49% |
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.47% | 1.49% | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.62% | 1.26% | 1.81% | 1.88% | 2.12% | 1.77% | 2.22% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USMV and EFAV have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFAV has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to USMV (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMV dropped -33.10% vs EFAV's -27.56%.
On 10-year performance, USMV leads with 9.69% vs 6.41% for EFAV. On fees, USMV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, USMV has performed better with a 9.69% return vs 6.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USMV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EFAV.
EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 1.47% for USMV.
USMV is categorized as Low Volatility, while EFAV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while EFAV tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USMV and 0.20% for EFAV.
EFAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USMV and EFAV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer