USMV vs. QUAL
USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) and QUAL (iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from iShares - USMV tracks the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index while QUAL tracks the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, USMV returned 9.79%/yr vs 14.47%/yr for QUAL. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
USMV vs. QUAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USMV achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than QUAL's 7.67% return. Over the past 10 years, USMV has underperformed QUAL with an annualized return of 9.79%, while QUAL has yielded a comparatively higher 14.47% annualized return.
USMV
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 0.51%
- 1Y
- 3.59%
- 3Y*
- 10.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.02%
- 10Y*
- 9.79%
QUAL
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- 7.67%
- 6M
- 6.84%
- 1Y
- 21.07%
- 3Y*
- 18.53%
- 5Y*
- 11.52%
- 10Y*
- 14.47%
USMV vs. QUAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.14% | 7.65% | 15.74% | 10.33% | -9.43% | 20.85% | 5.64% | 27.69% | 1.33% | 18.91% |
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 7.67% | 12.65% | 22.29% | 30.88% | -20.50% | 26.94% | 17.04% | 33.89% | -5.70% | 22.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between USMV and QUAL is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2013 | 0.84 |
Over the past year, the correlation between USMV and QUAL has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
USMV vs. QUAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USMV
QUAL
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
USMV
QUAL
Healthcare
USMV
QUAL
Financial Services
USMV
QUAL
Consumer Defensive
USMV
QUAL
Utilities
USMV
QUAL
Communication Services
USMV
QUAL
Industrials
USMV
QUAL
Consumer Cyclical
USMV
QUAL
Energy
USMV
QUAL
Real Estate
USMV
QUAL
Basic Materials
USMV
QUAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USMV vs. QUAL — Risk / Return Rank
USMV
QUAL
USMV vs. QUAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USMV | QUAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.31 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | 2.34 | -1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.82 | 10.65 | -8.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USMV vs. QUAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USMV drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, roughly equal to the maximum QUAL drawdown of -34.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMV and QUAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USMV | QUAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.10% | -34.06% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.46% | -9.03% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.36% | -18.00% | +8.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.93% | -28.23% | +10.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.10% | -34.06% | +0.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.63% | -2.82% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.87% | -4.09% | +1.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 1.98% | 0.00% |
Volatility
USMV vs. QUAL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) is 2.63%, while iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) has a volatility of 4.09%. This indicates that USMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USMV | QUAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 4.09% | -1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.14% | 9.63% | -3.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.60% | 12.14% | -3.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 17.39% | -5.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 18.10% | -3.59% |
USMV vs. QUAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both USMV and QUAL have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USMV vs. QUAL - Dividend Comparison
USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than QUAL's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 0.89% | 0.94% | 1.02% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 1.39% | 1.60% | 2.00% | 1.76% | 1.96% | 1.63% |
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.53% | 1.49% | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.62% | 1.26% | 1.81% | 1.88% | 2.12% | 1.77% | 2.22% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USMV and QUAL have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QUAL has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to USMV (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMV dropped -33.10% vs QUAL's -34.06%.
On 10-year performance, QUAL leads with 14.47% vs 9.79% for USMV. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QUAL has performed better with a 14.47% return vs 9.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USMV and QUAL have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.89% for QUAL.
USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while QUAL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index.
QUAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USMV and QUAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer