USMV vs. VFMV
USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) and VFMV (Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF) are both Low Volatility funds. USMV is passively managed, while VFMV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, USMV returned 6.93%/yr vs 9.42%/yr for VFMV. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. USMV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMV.
Performance
USMV vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USMV achieves a 5.12% return, which is significantly lower than VFMV's 11.34% return.
USMV
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- 6M
- 3.78%
- YTD
- 5.12%
- 1Y
- 8.05%
- 3Y*
- 11.61%
- 5Y*
- 6.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.67%
VFMV
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- 6M
- 7.15%
- YTD
- 11.34%
- 1Y
- 16.33%
- 3Y*
- 14.89%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $238.33M | $228.63M | $219.79M | |
| $2.03M | $2.13M | $2.31M |
USMV vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 5.12% | 7.65% | 15.74% | 10.33% | -9.43% | 20.85% | 5.64% | 27.69% | 2.54% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 11.34% | 10.52% | 16.91% | 8.86% | -5.73% | 20.75% | -0.19% | 27.26% | -0.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between USMV and VFMV is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018 | 0.90 |
The correlation between USMV and VFMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
USMV vs. VFMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USMV
VFMV
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Technology
USMV
VFMV
Healthcare
USMV
VFMV
Financial Services
USMV
VFMV
Consumer Defensive
USMV
VFMV
Utilities
USMV
VFMV
Industrials
USMV
VFMV
Consumer Cyclical
USMV
VFMV
Communication Services
USMV
VFMV
Energy
USMV
VFMV
Real Estate
USMV
VFMV
Basic Materials
USMV
VFMV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USMV vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank
USMV
VFMV
USMV vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USMV | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.33 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 2.73 | -1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.09 | 10.52 | -6.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USMV vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USMV drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, roughly equal to the maximum VFMV drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMV and VFMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USMV | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.10% | -33.64% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.46% | -6.00% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.36% | -10.35% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.93% | -15.41% | -2.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -0.94% | +0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.86% | -3.59% | +0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 1.56% | +0.42% |
Volatility
USMV vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) have volatilities of 2.63% and 2.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USMV | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 2.64% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.44% | 6.56% | -0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.54% | 8.93% | -0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.38% | 11.77% | +0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 14.16% | +0.35% |
USMV vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
USMV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USMV vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison
USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than VFMV's 1.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.47% | 1.49% | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.62% | 1.26% | 1.81% | 1.88% | 2.12% | 1.77% | 2.22% | 2.02% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.74% | 2.12% | 1.46% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 2.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USMV and VFMV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFMV has higher volatility (2.64%) compared to USMV (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMV dropped -33.10% vs VFMV's -33.64%.
On 5-year performance, VFMV leads with 9.42% vs 6.93% for USMV. On fees, VFMV is cheaper at 0.13% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VFMV has performed better with a 9.42% return vs 6.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMV is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for USMV.
VFMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 1.47% for USMV.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USMV and 0.13% for VFMV.
VFMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USMV and VFMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer