USML vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

USML (ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USML is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USML returned 8.67%/yr vs 16.21%/yr for SCHG. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USML charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

USML vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN (USML) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USML achieves a 4.25% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 7.74% return.

USML

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 4.47%
• YTD: 4.25%
• 6M: 4.48%
• 1Y: 4.31%
• 3Y*: 16.76%
• 5Y*: 8.67%
• 10Y*: —

SCHG

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 5.91%
• YTD: 7.74%
• 6M: 7.31%
• 1Y: 27.05%
• 3Y*: 25.53%
• 5Y*: 16.21%
• 10Y*: 18.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USML vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
USML ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN	4.25%	9.33%	23.97%	11.37%	-22.87%	42.12%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	7.74%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	21.87%

Correlation

The correlation between USML and SCHG is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2021	0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between USML and SCHG has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

USML vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USML

USML Risk / Return Rank: 12
USML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
USML Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
USML Omega Ratio Rank: 12
USML Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
USML Martin Ratio Rank: 13

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 43
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 49
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USML vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN (USML) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	USML	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.26	1.76	-1.49
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.48	2.37	-1.89
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.31	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.34	1.70	-1.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.03	5.70	-4.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

USML vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USML Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USML and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	USML	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26	1.76	-1.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.73	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.85	-0.40

Drawdowns

USML vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USML drawdown since its inception was -35.34%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USML and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	USML	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.34%	-34.59%	-0.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.09%	-16.41%	+3.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.14%	-23.39%	+4.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.34%	-34.59%	-0.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.48%	-0.57%	-1.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.42%	-5.20%	-5.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.33%	4.90%	-0.57%

Volatility

USML vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN (USML) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.31%. This indicates that USML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USML	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.03%	3.31%	+0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.54%	11.56%	-0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.33%	15.45%	+0.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.47%	22.27%	+2.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.29%	21.55%	+2.74%

USML vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

USML has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

USML vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

USML has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.36%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%
USML ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USML and SCHG in my portfolio?

USML and SCHG have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USML or SCHG?

USML has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to SCHG (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USML dropped -35.34% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, USML or SCHG?

On 5-year performance, SCHG leads with 16.21% vs 8.67% for USML. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USML or SCHG?

Over the 5-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 16.21% return vs 8.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USML or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for USML.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USML or SCHG?

SCHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for USML.

What is the main difference between USML and SCHG?

USML is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. USML tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for USML and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.