USML vs. SSO
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN (USML) and ProShares Ultra S&P 500 (SSO).
USML and SSO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. USML is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. It was launched on Feb 4, 2021. SSO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. Both USML and SSO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: USML or SSO.
Correlation
The correlation between USML and SSO is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
USML vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
USML:
1.84
SSO:
2.04
USML:
2.48
SSO:
2.57
USML:
1.32
SSO:
1.36
USML:
1.86
SSO:
3.03
USML:
9.61
SSO:
12.52
USML:
3.14%
SSO:
4.04%
USML:
16.42%
SSO:
24.81%
USML:
-35.34%
SSO:
-84.67%
USML:
-10.40%
SSO:
-5.21%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USML achieves a 26.01% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 46.24% return.
USML
26.01%
-7.60%
10.31%
27.49%
N/A
N/A
SSO
46.24%
-0.89%
14.51%
47.14%
20.76%
19.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USML vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
USML has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.90% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
USML vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN (USML) and ProShares Ultra S&P 500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
USML vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
USML has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USML ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P 500 | 0.57% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% | 0.32% | 0.26% |
Drawdowns
USML vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USML drawdown since its inception was -35.34%, smaller than the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USML and SSO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
USML vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN (USML) is 5.87%, while ProShares Ultra S&P 500 (SSO) has a volatility of 7.48%. This indicates that USML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.