USML vs. VFMV
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN (USML) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV).
USML and VFMV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. USML is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. It was launched on Feb 4, 2021. VFMV is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Feb 13, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: USML or VFMV.
Key characteristics
USML | VFMV | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 30.02% | 16.81% |
1Y Return | 51.44% | 28.05% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 6.65% | 8.01% |
Sharpe Ratio | 3.39 | 3.27 |
Sortino Ratio | 4.32 | 4.54 |
Omega Ratio | 1.58 | 1.60 |
Calmar Ratio | 2.02 | 4.38 |
Martin Ratio | 20.81 | 24.84 |
Ulcer Index | 2.57% | 1.17% |
Daily Std Dev | 15.80% | 8.88% |
Max Drawdown | -35.34% | -33.64% |
Current Drawdown | -4.84% | -1.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between USML and VFMV is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
USML vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, USML achieves a 30.02% return, which is significantly higher than VFMV's 16.81% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USML vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
USML has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
USML vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN (USML) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
USML vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison
USML has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.50% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 2.29% |
Drawdowns
USML vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USML drawdown since its inception was -35.34%, which is greater than VFMV's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USML and VFMV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
USML vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN (USML) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) at 2.40%. This indicates that USML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.