PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
USML vs. VFMV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

USML vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN (USML) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
17.93%
10.79%
USML
VFMV

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USML achieves a 33.40% return, which is significantly higher than VFMV's 20.25% return.


USML

YTD

33.40%

1M

-1.20%

6M

17.93%

1Y

42.82%

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

VFMV

YTD

20.25%

1M

1.68%

6M

10.79%

1Y

26.23%

5Y (annualized)

8.91%

10Y (annualized)

N/A

Key characteristics


USMLVFMV
Sharpe Ratio2.662.90
Sortino Ratio3.494.06
Omega Ratio1.461.53
Calmar Ratio2.145.98
Martin Ratio15.7221.35
Ulcer Index2.74%1.22%
Daily Std Dev16.17%9.01%
Max Drawdown-35.34%-33.64%
Current Drawdown-3.23%-1.28%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


USML vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

USML has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio.


USML
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN
Expense ratio chart for USML: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%
Expense ratio chart for VFMV: current value at 0.13% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.13%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between USML and VFMV is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

USML vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN (USML) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for USML, currently valued at 2.66, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.662.90
The chart of Sortino ratio for USML, currently valued at 3.49, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.494.06
The chart of Omega ratio for USML, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.461.53
The chart of Calmar ratio for USML, currently valued at 2.14, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.145.98
The chart of Martin ratio for USML, currently valued at 15.72, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0015.7221.35
USML
VFMV

The current USML Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the VFMV Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USML and VFMV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.66
2.90
USML
VFMV

Dividends

USML vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison

USML has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%.


TTM202320222021202020192018
USML
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
1.45%2.20%2.08%1.31%2.14%2.43%2.30%

Drawdowns

USML vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USML drawdown since its inception was -35.34%, which is greater than VFMV's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USML and VFMV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.23%
-1.28%
USML
VFMV

Volatility

USML vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN (USML) has a higher volatility of 6.14% compared to Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) at 3.24%. This indicates that USML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.14%
3.24%
USML
VFMV