USMC vs. SPYG
USMC (Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USMC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Mega Cap Select Leaders Index, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USMC returned 15.38%/yr vs 16.07%/yr for SPYG. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USMC charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
USMC vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USMC achieves a 8.67% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 13.73% return.
USMC
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 4.55%
- YTD
- 8.67%
- 6M
- 8.32%
- 1Y
- 23.51%
- 3Y*
- 22.13%
- 5Y*
- 15.38%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 6.54%
- YTD
- 13.73%
- 6M
- 13.08%
- 1Y
- 33.66%
- 3Y*
- 28.20%
- 5Y*
- 16.07%
- 10Y*
- 18.16%
USMC vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMC Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF | 8.67% | 14.99% | 29.82% | 31.57% | -17.17% | 26.30% | 16.05% | 27.37% | -2.30% | 5.48% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 13.73% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 5.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between USMC and SPYG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2017 | 0.91 |
The correlation between USMC and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
USMC vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USMC
SPYG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
USMC
SPYG
Financial Services
USMC
SPYG
Communication Services
USMC
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
USMC
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
USMC
SPYG
Healthcare
USMC
SPYG
Industrials
USMC
SPYG
Energy
USMC
SPYG
Basic Materials
USMC
-
SPYG
Real Estate
USMC
-
SPYG
Utilities
USMC
-
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USMC vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
USMC
SPYG
USMC vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USMC | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.37 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 2.46 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.77 | 10.17 | -1.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USMC | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 2.11 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 0.76 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.35 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
USMC vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USMC drawdown since its inception was -29.97%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMC and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USMC | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.97% | -67.63% | +37.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.30% | -13.76% | +3.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.12% | -22.14% | +3.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.09% | -32.67% | +8.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -1.15% | +0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.40% | -24.32% | +19.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 3.32% | -0.63% |
Volatility
USMC vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) is 2.45%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that USMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USMC | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.45% | 4.34% | -1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.68% | 12.46% | -3.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.81% | 16.06% | -4.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.35% | 21.16% | -4.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 20.64% | -2.39% |
USMC vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
USMC has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USMC vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
USMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than SPYG's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
USMC Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF | 0.74% | 0.79% | 1.04% | 1.35% | 1.78% | 1.53% | 1.55% | 2.01% | 2.28% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, USMC and SPYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPYG has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to USMC (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMC dropped -29.97% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 5-year performance, SPYG leads with 16.07% vs 15.38% for USMC. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, USMC has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 16.07% return vs 15.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for USMC.
USMC has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.47% for SPYG.
USMC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. USMC tracks Nasdaq US Mega Cap Select Leaders Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Principal and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for USMC and 0.04% for SPYG.
SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USMC and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer