USMC vs. VGT
USMC (Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USMC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Mega Cap Select Leaders Index, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USMC returned 15.07%/yr vs 20.58%/yr for VGT. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USMC charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
USMC vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USMC achieves a 7.90% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 28.03% return.
USMC
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 7.90%
- 6M
- 7.36%
- 1Y
- 23.29%
- 3Y*
- 20.97%
- 5Y*
- 15.07%
- 10Y*
- —
VGT
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 28.03%
- 6M
- 26.85%
- 1Y
- 54.06%
- 3Y*
- 31.77%
- 5Y*
- 20.58%
- 10Y*
- 25.96%
USMC vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMC Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF | 7.90% | 14.99% | 29.82% | 31.57% | -17.17% | 26.30% | 16.05% | 27.37% | -2.30% | 5.48% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 28.03% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 6.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between USMC and VGT is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2017 | 0.85 |
The correlation between USMC and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
USMC vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USMC
VGT
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
USMC
VGT
Financial Services
USMC
VGT
Communication Services
USMC
VGT
Consumer Defensive
USMC
VGT
-
Consumer Cyclical
USMC
VGT
Healthcare
USMC
VGT
Industrials
USMC
VGT
Energy
USMC
VGT
Basic Materials
USMC
-
VGT
Real Estate
USMC
-
VGT
-
Utilities
USMC
-
VGT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USMC vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
USMC
VGT
USMC vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USMC | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.40 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 3.31 | -1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.58 | 10.16 | -1.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USMC vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USMC drawdown since its inception was -29.97%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMC and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USMC | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.97% | -54.63% | +24.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.30% | -16.40% | +6.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.12% | -27.23% | +8.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.09% | -35.07% | +10.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -4.18% | +3.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.39% | -7.95% | +3.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 5.34% | -2.62% |
Volatility
USMC vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) is 4.20%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 10.66%. This indicates that USMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USMC | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 10.66% | -6.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.35% | 18.19% | -8.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.26% | 22.44% | -10.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 25.50% | -9.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 24.78% | -6.54% |
USMC vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
USMC has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USMC vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
USMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, more than VGT's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMC Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF | 0.75% | 0.79% | 1.04% | 1.35% | 1.78% | 1.53% | 1.55% | 2.01% | 2.28% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USMC and VGT have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGT has higher volatility (10.66%) compared to USMC (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMC dropped -29.97% vs VGT's -54.63%.
On 5-year performance, VGT leads with 20.58% vs 15.07% for USMC. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, USMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VGT has performed better with a 20.58% return vs 15.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for USMC.
USMC has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.32% for VGT.
USMC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. USMC tracks Nasdaq US Mega Cap Select Leaders Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for USMC and 0.09% for VGT.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USMC and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer