PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USL vs. SCHJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USL vs. SCHJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP (USL) and Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USL achieves a 50.47% return, which is significantly higher than SCHJ's 0.75% return.


USL

1D
0.72%
1M
11.48%
6M
34.61%
YTD
50.47%
1Y
36.97%
3Y*
10.51%
5Y*
14.04%
10Y*
11.91%
ALL TIME*
-0.05%

SCHJ

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.28%
6M
0.42%
YTD
0.75%
1Y
2.99%
3Y*
5.46%
5Y*
2.31%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.98M$7.81M$6.46M
$634.47K$669.88K$1.15M

USL vs. SCHJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP
50.47%-12.37%8.30%-1.11%27.10%62.48%-25.23%15.47%
SCHJ
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
0.75%6.80%4.89%6.36%-5.73%-0.67%5.30%0.61%

Correlation

The correlation between USL and SCHJ is -0.39, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2019

-0.07

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between USL and SCHJ has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.07 to -0.39, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USL vs. SCHJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHJ
SCHJ Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SCHJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHJ Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHJ Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USL vs. SCHJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP (USL) and Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USLSCHJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.35

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

2.44

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.38

9.17

-4.78

USL vs. SCHJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USL Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the SCHJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USL and SCHJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USL vs. SCHJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USL drawdown since its inception was -89.06%, which is greater than SCHJ's maximum drawdown of -13.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USL and SCHJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USLSCHJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.06%

-13.62%

-75.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.91%

-1.47%

-19.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.33%

-1.47%

-21.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.82%

-9.38%

-24.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.93%

-0.33%

-42.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.30%

-1.85%

-59.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.38%

0.39%

+7.99%

Volatility

USL vs. SCHJ - Volatility Comparison

United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP (USL) has a higher volatility of 10.45% compared to Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) at 0.53%. This indicates that USL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USLSCHJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.45%

0.53%

+9.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.73%

1.53%

+24.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.92%

1.93%

+27.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.36%

2.95%

+27.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.35%

4.10%

+28.25%

USL vs. SCHJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

USL has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHJ's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

USL vs. SCHJ - Dividend Comparison

USL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
SCHJ
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
4.09%4.42%4.00%2.98%1.64%0.94%2.54%0.42%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USL and SCHJ have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USL has higher volatility (10.45%) compared to SCHJ (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USL dropped -89.06% vs SCHJ's -13.62%.

On 5-year performance, USL leads with 14.04% vs 2.31% for SCHJ. On fees, SCHJ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USL has performed better with a 14.04% return vs 2.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHJ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for USL.

SCHJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

USL is categorized as Oil & Gas, while SCHJ is Short-Term Bond. USL tracks Equal-Weighted 12-Month NYMEX WTI Crude Oil Futures Contracts, while SCHJ tracks Bloomberg US 1-5 Year Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: USCF and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for USL and 0.03% for SCHJ.

SCHJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USL and SCHJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer