PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHJ vs. SHV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHJ vs. SHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHJ achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly lower than SHV's 1.42% return.


SCHJ

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.09%
YTD
0.64%
6M
1.06%
1Y
4.58%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
2.35%
10Y*

SHV

1D
0.02%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
2.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHJ vs. SHV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SCHJ
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
0.64%6.80%4.89%6.36%-5.73%-0.67%5.30%0.61%
SHV
iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
1.42%4.21%5.12%5.04%0.94%-0.10%0.81%0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHJ and SHV is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2019

0.26

The correlation between SCHJ and SHV shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHJ vs. SHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHJ
SCHJ Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SCHJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHJ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHJ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SHV
SHV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHJ vs. SHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHJSHVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.46

19.64

-17.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.84

150.25

-146.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

54.02

-52.53

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

433.49

-430.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.34

2,436.45

-2,424.11

SCHJ vs. SHV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is lower than the SHV Sharpe Ratio of 19.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHJ and SHV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHJSHVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

19.64

-17.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

11.57

-10.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

8.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

4.50

-3.86

Drawdowns

SCHJ vs. SHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHJ drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, which is greater than SHV's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHJ and SHV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHJSHVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.62%

-0.45%

-13.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.47%

-0.01%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.47%

-0.03%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.43%

-0.40%

-9.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

0.00%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.89%

-0.03%

-1.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

0.00%

+0.37%

Volatility

SCHJ vs. SHV - Volatility Comparison

Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) has a higher volatility of 0.56% compared to iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) at 0.05%. This indicates that SCHJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHJSHVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.56%

0.05%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.36%

0.12%

+1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87%

0.20%

+1.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.94%

0.29%

+2.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.13%

0.28%

+3.85%

SCHJ vs. SHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHJ has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SHV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHJ vs. SHV - Dividend Comparison

SCHJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than SHV's 3.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHJ
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
4.50%4.42%4.00%2.98%1.64%0.94%2.54%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHV
iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.83%4.09%5.02%4.73%1.39%0.00%0.74%2.19%1.66%0.72%0.34%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHJ and SHV have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHJ has higher volatility (0.56%) compared to SHV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHJ dropped -13.62% vs SHV's -0.45%.

On 5-year performance, SHV leads with 3.32% vs 2.35% for SCHJ. On fees, SCHJ is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SHV has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SHV has performed better with a 3.32% return vs 2.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHJ is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SHV.

SCHJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 3.83% for SHV.

SCHJ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SHV is Government Bonds. SCHJ tracks Bloomberg US Corporate (1-5 Y), while SHV tracks ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHJ and 0.15% for SHV.

SHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.64 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHJ and SHV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer