SCHJ vs. SCHO
SCHJ (Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF) and SCHO (Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHJ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corporate (1-5 Y), while SCHO is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHJ returned 2.35%/yr vs 1.81%/yr for SCHO. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHJ charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHO.
Performance
SCHJ vs. SCHO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHJ achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly higher than SCHO's 0.46% return.
SCHJ
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 4.58%
- 3Y*
- 5.52%
- 5Y*
- 2.35%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 3.47%
- 3Y*
- 4.17%
- 5Y*
- 1.81%
- 10Y*
- 1.72%
SCHJ vs. SCHO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 0.64% | 6.80% | 4.89% | 6.36% | -5.73% | -0.67% | 5.30% | 0.61% |
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 0.46% | 5.49% | 3.65% | 4.31% | -3.87% | -0.64% | 3.11% | 0.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHJ and SCHO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2019 | 0.75 |
The correlation between SCHJ and SCHO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHJ vs. SCHO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHJ
SCHO
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
SCHJ
SCHO
Technology
SCHJ
SCHO
Healthcare
SCHJ
SCHO
-
Industrials
SCHJ
SCHO
-
Consumer Cyclical
SCHJ
SCHO
-
Utilities
SCHJ
SCHO
-
Consumer Defensive
SCHJ
SCHO
-
Communication Services
SCHJ
SCHO
Real Estate
SCHJ
SCHO
-
Energy
SCHJ
SCHO
-
Basic Materials
SCHJ
SCHO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHJ vs. SCHO — Risk / Return Rank
SCHJ
SCHO
SCHJ vs. SCHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHJ | SCHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.46 | 2.55 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.84 | 4.17 | -0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.52 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 3.93 | -0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.34 | 17.00 | -4.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHJ | SCHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 2.55 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.92 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 1.00 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
SCHJ vs. SCHO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHJ drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, which is greater than SCHO's maximum drawdown of -5.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHJ and SCHO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHJ | SCHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.62% | -5.69% | -7.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.47% | -0.86% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.47% | -0.98% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.43% | -5.69% | -3.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.23% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.89% | -0.61% | -1.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.37% | 0.20% | +0.17% |
Volatility
SCHJ vs. SCHO - Volatility Comparison
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) has a higher volatility of 0.56% compared to Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) at 0.43%. This indicates that SCHJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHJ | SCHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.56% | 0.43% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.36% | 0.90% | +0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87% | 1.37% | +0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.94% | 1.98% | +0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.13% | 1.56% | +2.57% |
SCHJ vs. SCHO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHJ has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHJ vs. SCHO - Dividend Comparison
SCHJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than SCHO's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 4.50% | 4.42% | 4.00% | 2.98% | 1.64% | 0.94% | 2.54% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 3.91% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 3.76% | 1.34% | 0.41% | 1.27% | 2.27% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 0.82% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHJ and SCHO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHJ has higher volatility (0.56%) compared to SCHO (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHJ dropped -13.62% vs SCHO's -5.69%.
On 5-year performance, SCHJ leads with 2.35% vs 1.81% for SCHO. On fees, SCHO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHO has been the lower-risk option at 0.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHJ has performed better with a 2.35% return vs 1.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for SCHJ.
SCHJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 3.91% for SCHO.
SCHJ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SCHO is Government Bonds. SCHJ tracks Bloomberg US Corporate (1-5 Y), while SCHO tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHJ and 0.03% for SCHO.
SCHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHJ and SCHO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer