PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHJ vs. SCHO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHJ vs. SCHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHJ achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly higher than SCHO's 0.42% return.


SCHJ

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.56%
6M
0.86%
1Y
4.52%
3Y*
5.49%
5Y*
2.31%
10Y*

SCHO

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.06%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.78%
1Y
3.39%
3Y*
4.15%
5Y*
1.80%
10Y*
1.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHJ vs. SCHO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SCHJ
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
0.56%6.80%4.89%6.36%-5.73%-0.67%5.30%0.61%
SCHO
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
0.42%5.49%3.65%4.31%-3.87%-0.64%3.11%0.28%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHJ and SCHO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2019

0.75

The correlation between SCHJ and SCHO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHJ vs. SCHO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHJ
SCHO

Financial Services

30.8%
0.2%

Technology

8.3%
1.1%

Healthcare

7.9%

-

Industrials

7.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%

-

Utilities

6.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.6%

-

Communication Services

4.3%
1.1%

Real Estate

4.1%

-

Energy

4.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.4%

-

Financial Services

SCHJ
30.8%
SCHO
0.2%

Technology

SCHJ
8.3%
SCHO
1.1%

Healthcare

SCHJ
7.9%
SCHO

-

Industrials

SCHJ
7.2%
SCHO

-

Consumer Cyclical

SCHJ
6.8%
SCHO

-

Utilities

SCHJ
6.4%
SCHO

-

Consumer Defensive

SCHJ
4.6%
SCHO

-

Communication Services

SCHJ
4.3%
SCHO
1.1%

Real Estate

SCHJ
4.1%
SCHO

-

Energy

SCHJ
4.0%
SCHO

-

Basic Materials

SCHJ
1.4%
SCHO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHJ vs. SCHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHJ
SCHJ Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SCHJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHJ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHO
SCHO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SCHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHJ vs. SCHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHJSCHODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.42

2.48

-0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.78

4.06

-0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.50

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.96

-0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.17

17.03

-4.86

SCHJ vs. SCHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the SCHO Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHJ and SCHO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHJSCHODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.48

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.91

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.99

-0.35

Drawdowns

SCHJ vs. SCHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHJ drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, which is greater than SCHO's maximum drawdown of -5.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHJ and SCHO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHJSCHODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.62%

-5.69%

-7.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.47%

-0.86%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.47%

-0.98%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.43%

-5.69%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.27%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.88%

-0.61%

-1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

0.20%

+0.17%

Volatility

SCHJ vs. SCHO - Volatility Comparison

Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) has a higher volatility of 0.55% compared to Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) at 0.41%. This indicates that SCHJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHJSCHODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.55%

0.41%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.35%

0.90%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87%

1.37%

+0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.94%

1.98%

+0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.13%

1.56%

+2.57%

SCHJ vs. SCHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHJ has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHJ vs. SCHO - Dividend Comparison

SCHJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than SCHO's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHJ
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
4.50%4.42%4.00%2.98%1.64%0.94%2.54%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHO
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
3.91%4.06%4.29%3.76%1.34%0.41%1.27%2.27%1.60%1.12%0.82%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHJ and SCHO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHJ has higher volatility (0.55%) compared to SCHO (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHJ dropped -13.62% vs SCHO's -5.69%.

On 5-year performance, SCHJ leads with 2.31% vs 1.80% for SCHO. On fees, SCHO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHO has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHJ has performed better with a 2.31% return vs 1.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for SCHJ.

SCHJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 3.91% for SCHO.

SCHJ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SCHO is Government Bonds. SCHJ tracks Bloomberg US Corporate (1-5 Y), while SCHO tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHJ and 0.03% for SCHO.

SCHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHJ and SCHO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer