SCHJ vs. SCHQ
SCHJ (Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF) and SCHQ (Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHJ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corporate (1-5 Y), while SCHQ is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHJ returned 2.31%/yr vs -5.29%/yr for SCHQ. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHJ charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHQ.
Performance
SCHJ vs. SCHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHJ achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly higher than SCHQ's -0.43% return.
SCHJ
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- 4.52%
- 3Y*
- 5.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.31%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHQ
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- -1.74%
- 1Y
- 5.22%
- 3Y*
- -0.72%
- 5Y*
- -5.29%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHJ vs. SCHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 0.56% | 6.80% | 4.89% | 6.36% | -5.73% | -0.67% | 5.30% | 0.61% |
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | -0.43% | 5.50% | -6.44% | 3.43% | -29.44% | -4.86% | 17.73% | -4.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHJ and SCHQ is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2019 | 0.60 |
The correlation between SCHJ and SCHQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.71 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHJ vs. SCHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHJ
SCHQ
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
SCHJ
SCHQ
Technology
SCHJ
SCHQ
Healthcare
SCHJ
SCHQ
-
Industrials
SCHJ
SCHQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
SCHJ
SCHQ
-
Utilities
SCHJ
SCHQ
-
Consumer Defensive
SCHJ
SCHQ
-
Communication Services
SCHJ
SCHQ
Real Estate
SCHJ
SCHQ
-
Energy
SCHJ
SCHQ
-
Basic Materials
SCHJ
SCHQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHJ vs. SCHQ — Risk / Return Rank
SCHJ
SCHQ
SCHJ vs. SCHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHJ | SCHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.10 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 0.75 | +2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.17 | 1.94 | +10.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHJ | SCHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 0.59 | +1.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | -0.37 | +1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | -0.25 | +0.89 |
Drawdowns
SCHJ vs. SCHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHJ drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, smaller than the maximum SCHQ drawdown of -46.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHJ and SCHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHJ | SCHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.62% | -46.13% | +32.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.47% | -7.01% | +5.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.47% | -17.65% | +16.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.43% | -40.93% | +31.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -36.82% | +36.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.88% | -26.36% | +24.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.37% | 2.70% | -2.33% |
Volatility
SCHJ vs. SCHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) is 0.55%, while Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) has a volatility of 2.57%. This indicates that SCHJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHJ | SCHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.55% | 2.57% | -2.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.35% | 5.94% | -4.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87% | 8.93% | -7.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.94% | 14.54% | -11.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.13% | 15.33% | -11.20% |
SCHJ vs. SCHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHJ has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHQ's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHJ vs. SCHQ - Dividend Comparison
SCHJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, less than SCHQ's 4.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 4.50% | 4.42% | 4.00% | 2.98% | 1.64% | 0.94% | 2.54% | 0.42% |
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 4.79% | 4.54% | 4.58% | 3.79% | 2.88% | 1.69% | 1.51% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHJ and SCHQ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHQ has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to SCHJ (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHJ dropped -13.62% vs SCHQ's -46.13%.
On 5-year performance, SCHJ leads with 2.31% vs -5.29% for SCHQ. On fees, SCHQ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHJ has performed better with a 2.31% return vs -5.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHQ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for SCHJ.
SCHQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 4.50% for SCHJ.
SCHJ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SCHQ is Government Bonds. SCHJ tracks Bloomberg US Corporate (1-5 Y), while SCHQ tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHJ and 0.03% for SCHQ.
SCHJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHJ and SCHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer