PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHJ vs. SCHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHJ vs. SCHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHJ achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly higher than SCHQ's -0.43% return.


SCHJ

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.56%
6M
0.86%
1Y
4.52%
3Y*
5.49%
5Y*
2.31%
10Y*

SCHQ

1D
-0.45%
1M
0.65%
YTD
-0.43%
6M
-1.74%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
-0.72%
5Y*
-5.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHJ vs. SCHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SCHJ
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
0.56%6.80%4.89%6.36%-5.73%-0.67%5.30%0.61%
SCHQ
Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
-0.43%5.50%-6.44%3.43%-29.44%-4.86%17.73%-4.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHJ and SCHQ is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2019

0.60

The correlation between SCHJ and SCHQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.71 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHJ vs. SCHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHJ
SCHQ

Financial Services

30.8%
1.0%

Technology

8.3%
4.9%

Healthcare

7.9%

-

Industrials

7.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%

-

Utilities

6.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.6%

-

Communication Services

4.3%
3.3%

Real Estate

4.1%

-

Energy

4.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.4%

-

Financial Services

SCHJ
30.8%
SCHQ
1.0%

Technology

SCHJ
8.3%
SCHQ
4.9%

Healthcare

SCHJ
7.9%
SCHQ

-

Industrials

SCHJ
7.2%
SCHQ

-

Consumer Cyclical

SCHJ
6.8%
SCHQ

-

Utilities

SCHJ
6.4%
SCHQ

-

Consumer Defensive

SCHJ
4.6%
SCHQ

-

Communication Services

SCHJ
4.3%
SCHQ
3.3%

Real Estate

SCHJ
4.1%
SCHQ

-

Energy

SCHJ
4.0%
SCHQ

-

Basic Materials

SCHJ
1.4%
SCHQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHJ vs. SCHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHJ
SCHJ Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SCHJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHJ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHQ
SCHQ Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
SCHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHJ vs. SCHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHJSCHQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.42

0.59

+1.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.78

0.91

+2.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.10

+0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

0.75

+2.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.17

1.94

+10.23

SCHJ vs. SCHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the SCHQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHJ and SCHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHJSCHQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

0.59

+1.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

-0.37

+1.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

-0.25

+0.89

Drawdowns

SCHJ vs. SCHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHJ drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, smaller than the maximum SCHQ drawdown of -46.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHJ and SCHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHJSCHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.62%

-46.13%

+32.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.47%

-7.01%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.47%

-17.65%

+16.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.43%

-40.93%

+31.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-36.82%

+36.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.88%

-26.36%

+24.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

2.70%

-2.33%

Volatility

SCHJ vs. SCHQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) is 0.55%, while Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) has a volatility of 2.57%. This indicates that SCHJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHJSCHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.55%

2.57%

-2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.35%

5.94%

-4.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87%

8.93%

-7.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.94%

14.54%

-11.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.13%

15.33%

-11.20%

SCHJ vs. SCHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHJ has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHQ's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHJ vs. SCHQ - Dividend Comparison

SCHJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, less than SCHQ's 4.79% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
SCHJ
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
4.50%4.42%4.00%2.98%1.64%0.94%2.54%0.42%
SCHQ
Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
4.79%4.54%4.58%3.79%2.88%1.69%1.51%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHJ and SCHQ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHQ has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to SCHJ (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHJ dropped -13.62% vs SCHQ's -46.13%.

On 5-year performance, SCHJ leads with 2.31% vs -5.29% for SCHQ. On fees, SCHQ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHJ has performed better with a 2.31% return vs -5.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHQ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for SCHJ.

SCHQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 4.50% for SCHJ.

SCHJ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SCHQ is Government Bonds. SCHJ tracks Bloomberg US Corporate (1-5 Y), while SCHQ tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHJ and 0.03% for SCHQ.

SCHJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHJ and SCHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer