USCGX vs. USBLX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

USCGX (USAA Capital Growth Fund) and USBLX (USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - USCGX is a Global Equities fund managed by Victory, while USBLX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Victory. Over the past 10 years, USCGX returned 11.92%/yr vs 8.29%/yr for USBLX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USCGX charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for USBLX.

Performance

USCGX vs. USBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Capital Growth Fund (USCGX) and USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund (USBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCGX achieves a 10.73% return, which is significantly higher than USBLX's 6.70% return. Over the past 10 years, USCGX has outperformed USBLX with an annualized return of 11.92%, while USBLX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.29% annualized return.

USCGX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 4.09%
• YTD: 10.73%
• 6M: 12.07%
• 1Y: 27.04%
• 3Y*: 20.62%
• 5Y*: 11.86%
• 10Y*: 11.92%

USBLX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 3.23%
• YTD: 6.70%
• 6M: 6.67%
• 1Y: 17.71%
• 3Y*: 13.04%
• 5Y*: 6.93%
• 10Y*: 8.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCGX vs. USBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
USCGX USAA Capital Growth Fund	10.73%	21.76%	16.31%	18.39%	-13.44%	22.94%	10.04%	20.13%	-11.53%	23.88%
USBLX USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund	6.70%	10.30%	13.32%	16.10%	-15.82%	14.80%	10.78%	18.46%	-1.95%	13.48%

Correlation

The correlation between USCGX and USBLX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2000	0.86

The correlation between USCGX and USBLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

USCGX vs. USBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCGX

USCGX Risk / Return Rank: 55
USCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
USCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
USCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
USCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
USCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

USBLX

USBLX Risk / Return Rank: 84
USBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
USBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
USBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
USBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
USBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCGX vs. USBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Capital Growth Fund (USCGX) and USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund (USBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	USCGX	USBLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	2.89	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	4.17	-1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.55	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.79	3.44	-0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.20	16.87	-4.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

USCGX vs. USBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the USBLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCGX and USBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	USCGX	USBLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	2.89	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.81	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	0.92	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.82	-0.54

Drawdowns

USCGX vs. USBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCGX drawdown since its inception was -63.08%, which is greater than USBLX's maximum drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCGX and USBLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	USCGX	USBLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.08%	-33.49%	-29.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.80%	-5.24%	-4.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.06%	-11.66%	-10.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.47%	-20.51%	-8.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.32%	-21.93%	-13.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.49%	-4.30%	-14.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	1.07%	+1.17%

Volatility

USCGX vs. USBLX - Volatility Comparison

USAA Capital Growth Fund (USCGX) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund (USBLX) at 1.77%. This indicates that USCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USCGX	USBLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.63%	1.77%	+1.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.95%	4.86%	+5.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.40%	6.22%	+6.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.90%	8.65%	+9.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.03%	9.09%	+8.94%

USCGX vs. USBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCGX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than USBLX's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

USCGX vs. USBLX - Dividend Comparison

USCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.83%, more than USBLX's 2.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
USBLX USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund	2.01%	1.96%	2.28%	2.11%	1.74%	1.66%	1.88%	1.95%	2.73%	2.16%	2.31%	2.69%
USCGX USAA Capital Growth Fund	9.83%	10.89%	12.63%	1.08%	7.69%	12.56%	3.08%	9.18%	9.40%	3.22%	1.46%	1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USCGX and USBLX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, USCGX and USBLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, USCGX or USBLX?

USCGX has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to USBLX (1.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCGX dropped -63.08% vs USBLX's -33.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.