USAGX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
USAGX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Aug 14, 1984. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
USAGX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
USAGX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USAGX USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund | -0.46% | 156.06% | 10.76% | 6.73% | -11.80% | -10.14% | 25.85% | 42.97% | -12.26% | 5.56% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.06% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USAGX achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's -13.06% return.
USAGX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -25.50%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- 13.74%
- 1Y
- 84.81%
- 3Y*
- 39.18%
- 5Y*
- 21.72%
- 10Y*
- 15.64%
SWLGX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USAGX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
USAGX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
USAGX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
USAGX
SWLGX
USAGX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USAGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.03 | 0.66 | +1.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.30 | 1.10 | +1.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.15 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 0.72 | +2.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.78 | 2.51 | +8.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USAGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 0.66 | +1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.56 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.68 | -0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between USAGX and SWLGX is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
USAGX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
USAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than SWLGX's 0.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USAGX USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund | 0.24% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 2.45% | 0.95% | 0.84% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.20% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.52% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
USAGX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USAGX drawdown since its inception was -80.89%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USAGX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| USAGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.89% | -32.69% | -48.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.12% | -16.16% | -13.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.72% | -32.69% | -13.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.50% | -16.16% | -9.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.17% | -7.13% | -36.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.09% | 4.62% | +3.47% |
Volatility
USAGX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) has a higher volatility of 15.38% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 5.38%. This indicates that USAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| USAGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.38% | 5.38% | +10.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.05% | 11.82% | +23.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.75% | 22.31% | +20.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.06% | 21.47% | +10.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.73% | 22.78% | +9.95% |