SWLGX vs. SWTSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) and Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund (SWTSX).
SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017. SWTSX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Jun 1, 1999.
Performance
SWLGX vs. SWTSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWLGX vs. SWTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.06% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
SWTSX Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund | -6.77% | 17.04% | 23.84% | 26.05% | -19.54% | 25.65% | 20.71% | 30.90% | -5.35% | -0.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWLGX achieves a -13.06% return, which is significantly lower than SWTSX's -6.77% return.
SWLGX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- —
SWTSX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -7.67%
- YTD
- -6.77%
- 6M
- -4.59%
- 1Y
- 14.70%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 10.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.21%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWLGX vs. SWTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWLGX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than SWTSX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
SWLGX vs. SWTSX — Risk / Return Rank
SWLGX
SWTSX
SWLGX vs. SWTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) and Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund (SWTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWLGX | SWTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.66 | 0.83 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.10 | 1.28 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.19 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 1.04 | -0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.51 | 5.04 | -2.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWLGX | SWTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | 0.83 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.58 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.40 | +0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWLGX and SWTSX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SWLGX vs. SWTSX - Dividend Comparison
SWLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than SWTSX's 1.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.52% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SWTSX Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund | 1.18% | 1.10% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.62% | 1.46% | 1.63% | 1.92% | 2.58% | 1.83% | 2.32% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
SWLGX vs. SWTSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWLGX drawdown since its inception was -32.69%, smaller than the maximum SWTSX drawdown of -54.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWLGX and SWTSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWLGX | SWTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.69% | -54.60% | +21.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.16% | -12.42% | -3.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.69% | -25.40% | -7.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.16% | -8.88% | -7.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.13% | -10.63% | +3.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.62% | 2.56% | +2.06% |
Volatility
SWLGX vs. SWTSX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund (SWTSX) at 4.45%. This indicates that SWLGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWLGX | SWTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 4.45% | +0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.82% | 9.42% | +2.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.31% | 18.52% | +3.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.47% | 17.41% | +4.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.78% | 18.57% | +4.21% |