PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWLGX vs. SWPPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWLGX vs. SWPPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWLGX achieves a 2.97% return, which is significantly lower than SWPPX's 8.55% return.


SWLGX

1D
1.63%
1M
-3.37%
YTD
2.97%
6M
3.50%
1Y
20.58%
3Y*
22.79%
5Y*
14.07%
10Y*

SWPPX

1D
1.76%
1M
-1.30%
YTD
8.55%
6M
8.92%
1Y
25.15%
3Y*
21.04%
5Y*
13.31%
10Y*
15.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWLGX vs. SWPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
2.97%18.55%33.30%42.67%-29.17%27.55%38.43%36.30%-1.59%-0.60%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
8.55%17.87%24.96%26.26%-18.14%28.67%18.38%31.46%-4.47%-0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SWLGX and SWPPX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2017

0.94

The correlation between SWLGX and SWPPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

SWLGX vs. SWPPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SWLGX
SWPPX

Technology

51.4%
35.6%

Communication Services

13.2%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%
10.1%

Healthcare

7.1%
8.5%

Industrials

5.7%
8.3%

Financial Services

5.4%
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
4.9%

Real Estate

0.4%
1.9%

Energy

0.4%
3.5%

Basic Materials

0.3%
1.8%

Utilities

0.3%
2.4%

Technology

SWLGX
51.4%
SWPPX
35.6%

Communication Services

SWLGX
13.2%
SWPPX
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SWLGX
13.2%
SWPPX
10.1%

Healthcare

SWLGX
7.1%
SWPPX
8.5%

Industrials

SWLGX
5.7%
SWPPX
8.3%

Financial Services

SWLGX
5.4%
SWPPX
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

SWLGX
2.7%
SWPPX
4.9%

Real Estate

SWLGX
0.4%
SWPPX
1.9%

Energy

SWLGX
0.4%
SWPPX
3.5%

Basic Materials

SWLGX
0.3%
SWPPX
1.8%

Utilities

SWLGX
0.3%
SWPPX
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWLGX vs. SWPPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWLGX
SWLGX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
SWLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
SWLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

SWPPX
SWPPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SWPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SWPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWLGX vs. SWPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWLGXSWPPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.36

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

2.74

-1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.03

12.42

-8.38

SWLGX vs. SWPPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWLGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the SWPPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWLGX and SWPPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWLGX vs. SWPPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWLGX drawdown since its inception was -32.69%, smaller than the maximum SWPPX drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWLGX and SWPPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWLGXSWPPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.69%

-55.06%

+22.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.16%

-8.89%

-7.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.30%

-18.74%

-4.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.69%

-24.51%

-8.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.55%

-2.81%

-2.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.04%

-9.94%

+2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.86%

1.96%

+2.90%

Volatility

SWLGX vs. SWPPX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) has a higher volatility of 5.46% compared to Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) at 4.47%. This indicates that SWLGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWPPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWLGXSWPPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.46%

4.47%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.42%

9.73%

+2.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.98%

12.40%

+3.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.57%

17.01%

+4.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.69%

18.26%

+4.43%

SWLGX vs. SWPPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWLGX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than SWPPX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWLGX vs. SWPPX - Dividend Comparison

SWLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than SWPPX's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
0.44%0.46%0.52%0.67%0.93%1.76%0.67%0.96%1.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
1.02%1.11%1.23%1.43%1.67%1.27%1.81%1.95%2.67%1.79%2.55%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SWLGX and SWPPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SWLGX has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to SWPPX (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWLGX dropped -32.69% vs SWPPX's -55.06%.

SWPPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWLGX and SWPPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer