PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URNM vs. XCLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

URNM vs. XCLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

URNM vs. XCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
URNM
NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF
16.36%40.78%-14.13%57.80%-11.86%36.29%
XCLR
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF
-4.88%10.25%20.67%15.64%-12.93%3.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URNM achieves a 16.36% return, which is significantly higher than XCLR's -4.88% return.


URNM

1D
1.14%
1M
-15.47%
YTD
16.36%
6M
10.70%
1Y
103.12%
3Y*
30.96%
5Y*
20.50%
10Y*

XCLR

1D
0.49%
1M
-4.99%
YTD
-4.88%
6M
-3.76%
1Y
10.37%
3Y*
12.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


URNM vs. XCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

URNM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XCLR's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

URNM vs. XCLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URNM
URNM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
URNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
URNM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
URNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
URNM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

XCLR
XCLR Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
XCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URNM vs. XCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


URNMXCLRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.01

0.99

+1.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.60

1.43

+1.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.19

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

1.28

+2.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.26

5.24

+4.02

URNM vs. XCLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URNM Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the XCLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URNM and XCLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


URNMXCLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

0.99

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.59

+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between URNM and XCLR is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

URNM vs. XCLR - Dividend Comparison

URNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, less than XCLR's 13.83% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
URNM
NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF
2.73%3.18%3.18%3.63%0.00%6.70%2.57%
XCLR
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF
13.83%13.15%18.76%1.40%1.01%1.70%0.00%

Drawdowns

URNM vs. XCLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URNM drawdown since its inception was -50.78%, which is greater than XCLR's maximum drawdown of -14.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNM and XCLR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


URNMXCLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.78%

-14.63%

-36.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.79%

-8.29%

-22.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.96%

-6.45%

-17.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.89%

-4.82%

-13.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.19%

2.02%

+9.17%

Volatility

URNM vs. XCLR - Volatility Comparison

NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) has a higher volatility of 17.16% compared to Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) at 3.42%. This indicates that URNM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


URNMXCLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.16%

3.42%

+13.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.48%

7.16%

+33.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.55%

10.53%

+41.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.95%

10.58%

+37.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.74%

10.58%

+36.16%