PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URNM vs. URNJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

URNM vs. URNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) and Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

URNM vs. URNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
URNM
NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF
15.05%40.78%-14.13%33.60%
URNJ
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
16.23%45.35%-18.34%19.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URNM achieves a 15.05% return, which is significantly lower than URNJ's 16.23% return.


URNM

1D
8.06%
1M
-12.22%
YTD
15.05%
6M
8.04%
1Y
101.26%
3Y*
30.47%
5Y*
20.22%
10Y*

URNJ

1D
9.99%
1M
-15.88%
YTD
16.23%
6M
7.68%
1Y
118.59%
3Y*
29.85%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


URNM vs. URNJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

URNM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than URNJ's 0.80% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

URNM vs. URNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URNM
URNM Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
URNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
URNM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
URNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
URNM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

URNJ
URNJ Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
URNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
URNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
URNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
URNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URNM vs. URNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) and Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


URNMURNJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.98

1.88

+0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.57

2.49

+0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.30

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

3.55

-0.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.12

8.73

+0.40

URNM vs. URNJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URNM Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the URNJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URNM and URNJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


URNMURNJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

1.88

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.33

+0.38

Correlation

The correlation between URNM and URNJ is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

URNM vs. URNJ - Dividend Comparison

URNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than URNJ's 5.66% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
URNM
NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF
2.76%3.18%3.18%3.63%0.00%6.70%2.57%
URNJ
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
5.66%6.58%4.33%4.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

URNM vs. URNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URNM drawdown since its inception was -50.78%, smaller than the maximum URNJ drawdown of -59.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNM and URNJ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


URNMURNJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.78%

-59.21%

+8.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.79%

-34.13%

+3.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.81%

-27.55%

+2.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.89%

-20.92%

+3.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.08%

13.87%

-2.79%

Volatility

URNM vs. URNJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) is 18.90%, while Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ) has a volatility of 20.63%. This indicates that URNM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


URNMURNJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.90%

20.63%

-1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.47%

47.79%

-7.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.55%

63.33%

-11.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.02%

53.24%

-5.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.76%

53.24%

-6.48%